Re: [PATCHv7 4/8] printk: always use deferred printk when flush printk_safe lines

[Petr Mladek]

On Fri 2017-02-03 11:04:18, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (02/02/17 16:52), Petr Mladek wrote:
> [..]
> > > I am still learning how to manage the patches in the printk.git tree.
> > > 
> > > I would like to add Steven's Reviewed-by tags, links to the mails,
> > > and list of CC-ed people. IMHO, the only way is to rebase the for-4.11
> > > and for-next branches. Then I could do the above suggested change during
> > > the rebase.
> > 
> > Alternatively you could send this other solution as a replay to this
> > thread. Then we could comment, add reviewed tags. And I could use
> > the new approved variant during the rebase.
> > 
> > This is probably better approach for non-oneliner changes.
> 
> by "the new approved variant" do you mean resend of the entire
> patch set (v8) or just 0004 patch?

I depends on how many and how complicated are possible conflicts
with the followup patches.

It is perfectly fine to send just 0004 if there are no conflicts
or if they are trivial to resolve.

Best Regards,
Petr