Re: [PATCH v13 1/2] serial: exar: split out the exar code from 8250_pci

From: Jan Kiszka
Date: Mon Feb 06 2017 - 14:47:35 EST


On 2017-02-06 20:37, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2017-01-30 23:28, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
>> From: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Add the serial driver for the Exar chips. And also register the
>> platform device for the GPIO provided by the Exar chips.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> ...
>
>> +static int default_setup(struct exar8250 *priv, struct pci_dev *pcidev,
>> + int idx, unsigned int offset,
>> + struct uart_8250_port *port)
>> +{
>> + const struct exar8250_board *board = priv->board;
>> + unsigned int bar = 0;
>> +
>> + port->port.iotype = UPIO_MEM;
>> + port->port.mapbase = pci_resource_start(pcidev, bar) + offset;
>> + port->port.membase = pcim_iomap_table(pcidev)[bar] + offset;
>
> This always gives you 0 for membase because you missed to call
> pcim_iomap for bar 0.
>
> Sorry to pick on this piece-wise, but I just ran into this bug now while
> porting patches over.
>
>> + port->port.regshift = board->reg_shift;
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int
>> +pci_connect_tech_setup(struct exar8250 *priv, struct pci_dev *pcidev,
>> + struct uart_8250_port *port, int idx)
>> +{
>> + unsigned int offset = idx * 0x200;
>> + unsigned int baud = 1843200;
>> +
>> + port->port.uartclk = baud * 16;
>> + return default_setup(priv, pcidev, idx, offset, port);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int
>> +pci_xr17c154_setup(struct exar8250 *priv, struct pci_dev *pcidev,
>> + struct uart_8250_port *port, int idx)
>> +{
>> + unsigned int offset = idx * 0x200;
>> + unsigned int baud = 921600;
>> +
>> + port->port.uartclk = baud * 16;
>> + return default_setup(priv, pcidev, idx, offset, port);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void setup_gpio(u8 __iomem *p)
>> +{
>> + writeb(0x00, p + UART_EXAR_MPIOINT_7_0);
>> + writeb(0x00, p + UART_EXAR_MPIOLVL_7_0);
>> + writeb(0x00, p + UART_EXAR_MPIO3T_7_0);
>> + writeb(0x00, p + UART_EXAR_MPIOINV_7_0);
>> + writeb(0x00, p + UART_EXAR_MPIOSEL_7_0);
>> + writeb(0x00, p + UART_EXAR_MPIOOD_7_0);
>> + writeb(0x00, p + UART_EXAR_MPIOINT_15_8);
>> + writeb(0x00, p + UART_EXAR_MPIOLVL_15_8);
>> + writeb(0x00, p + UART_EXAR_MPIO3T_15_8);
>> + writeb(0x00, p + UART_EXAR_MPIOINV_15_8);
>> + writeb(0x00, p + UART_EXAR_MPIOSEL_15_8);
>> + writeb(0x00, p + UART_EXAR_MPIOOD_15_8);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void *
>> +xr17v35x_register_gpio(struct pci_dev *pcidev)
>> +{
>> + struct platform_device *pdev;
>> +
>> + pdev = platform_device_alloc("gpio_exar", PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO);
>> + if (!pdev)
>> + return NULL;
>> +
>> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pcidev);
>> + if (platform_device_add(pdev) < 0) {
>> + platform_device_put(pdev);
>> + return NULL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return pdev;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int
>> +pci_xr17v35x_setup(struct exar8250 *priv, struct pci_dev *pcidev,
>> + struct uart_8250_port *port, int idx)
>> +{
>> + const struct exar8250_board *board = priv->board;
>> + unsigned int offset = idx * 0x400;
>> + unsigned int baud = 7812500;
>> + u8 __iomem *p;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + port->port.uartclk = baud * 16;
>> + /*
>> + * Setup the uart clock for the devices on expansion slot to
>> + * half the clock speed of the main chip (which is 125MHz)
>> + */
>> + if (board->has_slave && idx >= 8)
>> + port->port.uartclk /= 2;
>> +
>> + p = pci_ioremap_bar(pcidev, 0);
>
> If we move the default_setup before this, we can use pcim_iomap_table()
> and avoid this temporary mapping completely.

Actually, we should use port->port.membase here: The original code that
came from 8250_pci was broken already by always programming port 0,
irrespective of idx. Using membase, we will pick the right address for
the target port.

Jan

>
>> + if (!p)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + /* Setup Multipurpose Input/Output pins. */
>> + if (idx == 0)
>> + setup_gpio(p);
>> +
>> + writeb(0x00, p + UART_EXAR_8XMODE);
>> + writeb(UART_FCTR_EXAR_TRGD, p + UART_EXAR_FCTR);
>> + writeb(128, p + UART_EXAR_TXTRG);
>> + writeb(128, p + UART_EXAR_RXTRG);
>> + iounmap(p);
>> +
>> + ret = default_setup(priv, pcidev, idx, offset, port);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + if (idx == 0)
>> + port->port.private_data =
>> + xr17v35x_register_gpio(pcidev);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>
> I suppose I should still send patches on top, right?
>
> Jan
>

--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RDA ITP SES-DE
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux