Re: [PATCH net-next v1 6/7] bpf: Use the bpf_load_program() from the library

[MickaÃl SalaÃn]

On 06/02/2017 20:18, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 02/06/2017 08:16 PM, MickaÃl SalaÃn wrote:
>> On 06/02/2017 16:30, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>>> On 02/06/2017 12:14 AM, MickaÃl SalaÃn wrote:
>>>> Replace bpf_prog_load() with bpf_load_program() calls.
>>>>
>>>> Use the tools include directory instead of the installed one to allow
>>>> builds from other kernels.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: MickaÃl SalaÃn <mic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxx>
>>>> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> ---
>>>>    tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile        |  6 +++++-
>>>>    tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_sys.h       | 21
>>>> ---------------------
>>>>    tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_tag.c      |  6 ++++--
>>>>    tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c |  8 +++++---
>>>>    4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> No objections, but if so, can't we add the remaining missing
>>> pieces to bpf lib, so we can remove bpf_sys.h altogether?
>>
>> OK, I'll send a new patch replacing bpf_sys.h entirely.
> 
> Sounds great, thanks!
> 

Do you prefer a big patch or one for each replaced function?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature