Re: [PATCH v4 15/36] platform: add video-multiplexer subdevice driver
From: Pavel Machek
Date: Sun Feb 19 2017 - 17:12:44 EST
Hi!
> From: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> This driver can handle SoC internal and external video bus multiplexers,
> controlled either by register bit fields or by a GPIO. The subdevice
> passes through frame interval and mbus configuration of the active input
> to the output side.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> --
>
Again, this is slightly non-standard format. Normally changes from v1
go below ---, but in your case it would cut off the signoff...
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/video-multiplexer.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/video-multiplexer.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..9d133d9
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/video-multiplexer.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
> +Video Multiplexer
> +=================
> +
> +Video multiplexers allow to select between multiple input ports. Video received
> +on the active input port is passed through to the output port. Muxes described
> +by this binding may be controlled by a syscon register bitfield or by a GPIO.
> +
> +Required properties:
> +- compatible : should be "video-multiplexer"
> +- reg: should be register base of the register containing the control bitfield
> +- bit-mask: bitmask of the control bitfield in the control register
> +- bit-shift: bit offset of the control bitfield in the control register
> +- gpios: alternatively to reg, bit-mask, and bit-shift, a single GPIO phandle
> + may be given to switch between two inputs
> +- #address-cells: should be <1>
> +- #size-cells: should be <0>
> +- port@*: at least three port nodes containing endpoints connecting to the
> + source and sink devices according to of_graph bindings. The last port is
> + the output port, all others are inputs.
At least three? I guess it is exactly three with the gpio?
Plus you might want to describe which port correspond to which gpio
state/bitfield values...
> +struct vidsw {
I knew it: it is secretely a switch! :-).
> +static void vidsw_set_active(struct vidsw *vidsw, int active)
> +{
> + vidsw->active = active;
> + if (active < 0)
> + return;
> +
> + dev_dbg(vidsw->subdev.dev, "setting %d active\n", active);
> +
> + if (vidsw->field)
> + regmap_field_write(vidsw->field, active);
> + else if (vidsw->gpio)
> + gpiod_set_value(vidsw->gpio, active);
else dev_err()...?
> +static int vidsw_async_init(struct vidsw *vidsw, struct device_node *node)
> +{
> + struct device_node *ep;
> + u32 portno;
> + int numports;
numbports is int, so I guess portno should be, too?
> + portno = endpoint.base.port;
> + if (portno >= numports - 1)
> + continue;
> + if (!pad) {
> + /* Mirror the input side on the output side */
> + cfg->type = vidsw->endpoint[vidsw->active].bus_type;
> + if (cfg->type == V4L2_MBUS_PARALLEL ||
> + cfg->type == V4L2_MBUS_BT656)
> + cfg->flags = vidsw->endpoint[vidsw->active].bus.parallel.flags;
> + }
Will this need support for other V4L2_MBUS_ values?
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Sascha Hauer, Pengutronix");
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Philipp Zabel, Pengutronix");
Normally, MODULE_AUTHOR contains comma separated names of authors,
perhaps with <email@addresses>. Not sure two MODULE_AUTHORs per file
will work.
Thanks,
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature