Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] KVM: add KVM request variants without barrier

[David Hildenbrand]

Am 24.02.2017 um 20:49 schrieb Radim KrÄmÃÅ:
> The leading underscores denote that the call is just a bitop wrapper.

Actually, the leading underscore is misleading

If we want to match the semantics of set/test/clear_bit, using a leading
underscore might feel like using the non-atomic variants like
__clear_bit and friends.

I'd prefer to simply drop the underscore.

-- 
Thanks,

David