Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] KVM: add KVM request variants without barrier

[David Hildenbrand]

Am 27.02.2017 um 11:02 schrieb David Hildenbrand:
> Am 24.02.2017 um 20:49 schrieb Radim KrÄmÃÅ:
>> The leading underscores denote that the call is just a bitop wrapper.
> 
> Actually, the leading underscore is misleading
> 
> If we want to match the semantics of set/test/clear_bit, using a leading
> underscore might feel like using the non-atomic variants like
> __clear_bit and friends.
> 
> I'd prefer to simply drop the underscore.
> 

Okay, this is not really possible for __kvm_request_set(). Hm.....

-- 
Thanks,

David