Re: [PATCH v1 0/4] gpio: make gpiod_count() API consistent

[Andy Shevchenko]

On Mon, 2017-02-27 at 09:27 +0100, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> On Feb 20 2017 or thereabouts, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > There are three possibilities in gpiod_count(): ACPI, OF, and
> > platform data.
> > 
> > Some of them return 0, which requires to be handled separately,
> > though
> > developers rather lazy and just shadow an actual error code.
> > 
> > Let's make this API consistent by not allowing 0 in returned value.
> > 
> > There are luckily only 3 users right now, one of them handles this
> > properly, the rest is converted in this series.
> > 
> > Series is supposed to go through GPIO tree.
> > 
> > Andy Shevchenko (4):
> > Â gpio: acpi: Don't return 0 on acpi_gpio_count()
> > Â gpio: of: Don't return 0 on dt_gpio_count()
> > Â platform/x86: surface3_button: Propagate error from gpiod_count()
> > Â Input: soc_button_array - Propagate error from gpiod_count()
> 
> Not sure if this still matters, but still:
> Acked-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@xxxxxxxxxx>

I'm sure it is.

Linus, is your plan to go through queue after merge window is closed?

-- 
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Intel Finland Oy