Re: [RFC PATCH] net: phy: Don't miss phy_suspend() on PHY_HALTED for PHYs with interrupts

From: Andrew Lunn
Date: Wed Mar 15 2017 - 10:11:12 EST


On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 03:51:27PM +0200, Roger Quadros wrote:
> Since commit 3c293f4e08b5 ("net: phy: Trigger state machine on state change and not polling.")
> phy_suspend() doesn't get called as part of phy_stop() for PHYs using
> interrupts because the phy state machine is never triggered after a phy_stop().
>
> Explicitly trigger the PHY state machine so that it can
> see the new PHY state (HALTED) and suspend the PHY.
>
> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@xxxxxx>

Hi Roger

This seems sensible. It mirrors what phy_start() does.

Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@xxxxxxx>

It does however lead to a follow up question. Are there other places
phydev->state is changed and it is missing a phy_trigger_machine()?

Andrew