Re: linux-next: manual merge of the char-misc tree with the tpmdd tree

[Greg KH]

On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 02:33:02PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the char-misc tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
> 
> between commits:
> 
>   67b67480db8b ("tpm: infrastructure for TPM spaces")
>   b8e3586e8536 ("tpm: expose spaces via a device link /dev/tpmrm<n>")
> 
> from the tpmdd tree and commit:
> 
>   8dbbf5825181 ("tpm-chip: utilize new cdev_device_add helper function")
> 
> from the char-misc tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
> 
> diff --cc drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
> index aade6995f310,935f0e92ad61..000000000000
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
> @@@ -214,22 -186,7 +214,20 @@@ struct tpm_chip *tpm_chip_alloc(struct 
>   		chip->flags |= TPM_CHIP_FLAG_VIRTUAL;
>   
>   	cdev_init(&chip->cdev, &tpm_fops);
>  +	cdev_init(&chip->cdevs, &tpmrm_fops);
>   	chip->cdev.owner = THIS_MODULE;
>  +	chip->cdevs.owner = THIS_MODULE;
> - 	chip->cdev.kobj.parent = &chip->dev.kobj;
> - 	chip->cdevs.kobj.parent = &chip->devs.kobj;
>  +
>  +	chip->work_space.context_buf = kzalloc(PAGE_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
>  +	if (!chip->work_space.context_buf) {
>  +		rc = -ENOMEM;
>  +		goto out;
>  +	}
>  +	chip->work_space.session_buf = kzalloc(PAGE_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
>  +	if (!chip->work_space.session_buf) {
>  +		rc = -ENOMEM;
>  +		goto out;
>  +	}
>   
>   	return chip;
>   
> @@@ -273,44 -229,13 +271,22 @@@ static int tpm_add_char_device(struct t
>   {
>   	int rc;
>   
> - 	rc = cdev_add(&chip->cdev, chip->dev.devt, 1);
> + 	rc = cdev_device_add(&chip->cdev, &chip->dev);
>   	if (rc) {
>   		dev_err(&chip->dev,
> - 			"unable to cdev_add() %s, major %d, minor %d, err=%d\n",
> + 			"unable to cdev_device_add() %s, major %d, minor %d, err=%d\n",
>   			dev_name(&chip->dev), MAJOR(chip->dev.devt),
>   			MINOR(chip->dev.devt), rc);
>  +		return rc;
>  +	}
>   
> - 	rc = device_add(&chip->dev);
> - 	if (rc) {
> - 		dev_err(&chip->dev,
> - 			"unable to device_register() %s, major %d, minor %d, err=%d\n",
> - 			dev_name(&chip->dev), MAJOR(chip->dev.devt),
> - 			MINOR(chip->dev.devt), rc);
> - 
> - 		cdev_del(&chip->cdev);
> - 		return rc;
> - 	}
> - 
> - 	if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2)
> - 		rc = cdev_add(&chip->cdevs, chip->devs.devt, 1);
> - 	if (rc) {
> - 		dev_err(&chip->dev,
> - 			"unable to cdev_add() %s, major %d, minor %d, err=%d\n",
> - 			dev_name(&chip->devs), MAJOR(chip->devs.devt),
> - 			MINOR(chip->devs.devt), rc);
> - 		return rc;
> - 	}
> - 
>  +	if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2)
> - 		rc = device_add(&chip->devs);
> ++		rc = cdev_device_add(&chip->cdevs, &chip->devs);
>  +	if (rc) {
>  +		dev_err(&chip->dev,
> - 			"unable to device_register() %s, major %d, minor %d, err=%d\n",
> ++			"unable to cdev_device_add() %s, major %d, minor %d, err=%d\n",
>  +			dev_name(&chip->devs), MAJOR(chip->devs.devt),
>  +			MINOR(chip->devs.devt), rc);
> - 		cdev_del(&chip->cdevs);
>   		return rc;
>   	}
>   
> @@@ -447,10 -371,6 +422,8 @@@ void tpm_chip_unregister(struct tpm_chi
>   {
>   	tpm_del_legacy_sysfs(chip);
>   	tpm_bios_log_teardown(chip);
> - 	if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2) {
> - 		cdev_del(&chip->cdevs);
> - 		device_del(&chip->devs);
> - 	}
> ++	if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2)
> ++		cdev_device_del(&chip->cdevs, &chip->devs);
>   	tpm_del_char_device(chip);
>   }
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tpm_chip_unregister);

Looks good to me, thanks!

greg k-h