Re: [PATCH v1] tracing/kprobes: expose maxactive for kretprobe in kprobe_events
From: Alban Crequy
Date: Tue Mar 28 2017 - 12:09:23 EST
Thanks for the review,
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 5:23 PM, Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Mar 2017 15:52:22 +0200
> Alban Crequy <alban.crequy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> When a kretprobe is installed on a kernel function, there is a maximum
>> limit of how many calls in parallel it can catch (aka "maxactive"). A
>> kernel module could call register_kretprobe() and initialize maxactive
>> (see example in samples/kprobes/kretprobe_example.c).
>>
>> But that is not exposed to userspace and it is currently not possible to
>> choose maxactive when writing to /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/kprobe_events
>
> I see, I found same issue last week...
>
>>
>> The default maxactive can be as low as 1 on single-core with a
>> non-preemptive kernel. This is too low and we need to increase it not
>> only for recursive functions, but for functions that sleep or resched.
>>
>> This patch updates the format of the command that can be written to
>> kprobe_events so that maxactive can be optionally specified.
>
> Good! this is completely same what I'm planning to add.
>
>>
>> I need this for a bpf program attached to the kretprobe of
>> inet_csk_accept, which can sleep for a long time.
>
> I'm also preparing another patch for using kmalloc(GFP_ATOMIC) in
> kretprobe_pre_handler(), since this manual way is sometimes hard to
> estimate how many instances needed. Anyway, since that may involve
> unwilling memory allocation, this patch also needed.
Where is that kretprobe_pre_handler()? I don't see any allocations in
pre_handler_kretprobe().
>> BugLink: https://github.com/iovisor/bcc/issues/1072
>
> Could you also add Lukasz to Cc list, since he had reported an issue
> related this one.
>
> https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-trace/msg00448.html
>
> Please see my comments below.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Alban Crequy <alban@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> Documentation/trace/kprobetrace.txt | 4 +++-
>> kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>> 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/trace/kprobetrace.txt b/Documentation/trace/kprobetrace.txt
>> index 41ef9d8..655ca7e 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/trace/kprobetrace.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/trace/kprobetrace.txt
>> @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ current_tracer. Instead of that, add probe points via
>> Synopsis of kprobe_events
>> -------------------------
>> p[:[GRP/]EVENT] [MOD:]SYM[+offs]|MEMADDR [FETCHARGS] : Set a probe
>> - r[:[GRP/]EVENT] [MOD:]SYM[+0] [FETCHARGS] : Set a return probe
>> + r[MAXACTIVE][:[GRP/]EVENT] [MOD:]SYM[+0] [FETCHARGS] : Set a return probe
>> -:[GRP/]EVENT : Clear a probe
>>
>> GRP : Group name. If omitted, use "kprobes" for it.
>> @@ -32,6 +32,8 @@ Synopsis of kprobe_events
>> MOD : Module name which has given SYM.
>> SYM[+offs] : Symbol+offset where the probe is inserted.
>> MEMADDR : Address where the probe is inserted.
>> + MAXACTIVE : Maximum number of instances of the specified function that
>> + can be probed simultaneously, or 0 for the default.(*)
>
> Here, yoy don't need (*), since [MAXACTIVE] is not a FETCHARGS.
Why not? (*) refers to "(*) only for return probe." and the maxactive
only makes sense for the kretprobe.
>> FETCHARGS : Arguments. Each probe can have up to 128 args.
>> %REG : Fetch register REG
>> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
>> index 5f688cc..807e01c 100644
>> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
>> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
>> @@ -282,6 +282,7 @@ static struct trace_kprobe *alloc_trace_kprobe(const char *group,
>> void *addr,
>> const char *symbol,
>> unsigned long offs,
>> + int maxactive,
>> int nargs, bool is_return)
>> {
>> struct trace_kprobe *tk;
>> @@ -309,6 +310,8 @@ static struct trace_kprobe *alloc_trace_kprobe(const char *group,
>> else
>> tk->rp.kp.pre_handler = kprobe_dispatcher;
>>
>> + tk->rp.maxactive = maxactive;
>> +
>> if (!event || !is_good_name(event)) {
>> ret = -EINVAL;
>> goto error;
>> @@ -598,8 +601,10 @@ static int create_trace_kprobe(int argc, char **argv)
>> {
>> /*
>> * Argument syntax:
>> - * - Add kprobe: p[:[GRP/]EVENT] [MOD:]KSYM[+OFFS]|KADDR [FETCHARGS]
>> - * - Add kretprobe: r[:[GRP/]EVENT] [MOD:]KSYM[+0] [FETCHARGS]
>> + * - Add kprobe:
>> + * p[:[GRP/]EVENT] [MOD:]KSYM[+OFFS]|KADDR [FETCHARGS]
>> + * - Add kretprobe:
>> + * r[MAXACTIVE][:[GRP/]EVENT] [MOD:]KSYM[+0] [FETCHARGS]
>> * Fetch args:
>> * $retval : fetch return value
>> * $stack : fetch stack address
>> @@ -619,6 +624,7 @@ static int create_trace_kprobe(int argc, char **argv)
>> int i, ret = 0;
>> bool is_return = false, is_delete = false;
>> char *symbol = NULL, *event = NULL, *group = NULL;
>> + int maxactive = 0;
>> char *arg;
>> unsigned long offset = 0;
>> void *addr = NULL;
>> @@ -637,8 +643,26 @@ static int create_trace_kprobe(int argc, char **argv)
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>>
>> - if (argv[0][1] == ':') {
>> + if (is_return && isdigit(argv[0][1]) && strchr(&argv[0][1], ':')) {
>
> This only supports r[MAXACTIVE:[GRP/]EVENT]. e.g "r100" without event name.
>
> Thank you,
Ok, I will fix this.
By the way, the current code does not error out when there are extra characters:
"pfuzz inet_csk_accept" is currently a valid command.
I didn't change that.
>> + event = strchr(&argv[0][1], ':') + 1;
>> + event[-1] = '\0';
>> + ret = kstrtouint(&argv[0][1], 0, &maxactive);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + pr_info("Failed to parse maxactive.\n");
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> + /* kretprobes instances are iterated over via a list. The
>> + * maximum should stay reasonable.
>> + */
>> + if (maxactive > 1024) {
>> + pr_info("Maxactive is too big.\n");
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> + } else if (argv[0][1] == ':') {
>> event = &argv[0][2];
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (event) {
>> if (strchr(event, '/')) {
>> group = event;
>> event = strchr(group, '/') + 1;
>> @@ -718,8 +742,8 @@ static int create_trace_kprobe(int argc, char **argv)
>> is_return ? 'r' : 'p', addr);
>> event = buf;
>> }
>> - tk = alloc_trace_kprobe(group, event, addr, symbol, offset, argc,
>> - is_return);
>> + tk = alloc_trace_kprobe(group, event, addr, symbol, offset, maxactive,
>> + argc, is_return);
>> if (IS_ERR(tk)) {
>> pr_info("Failed to allocate trace_probe.(%d)\n",
>> (int)PTR_ERR(tk));
>> --
>> 2.7.4
>>
>
>
> --
> Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>