Re: [PATCH v1] tracing/kprobes: expose maxactive for kretprobe in kprobe_events
From: Masami Hiramatsu
Date: Tue Mar 28 2017 - 19:51:40 EST
On Tue, 28 Mar 2017 18:08:16 +0200
Alban Crequy <alban@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Thanks for the review,
>
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 5:23 PM, Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Tue, 28 Mar 2017 15:52:22 +0200
> > Alban Crequy <alban.crequy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> When a kretprobe is installed on a kernel function, there is a maximum
> >> limit of how many calls in parallel it can catch (aka "maxactive"). A
> >> kernel module could call register_kretprobe() and initialize maxactive
> >> (see example in samples/kprobes/kretprobe_example.c).
> >>
> >> But that is not exposed to userspace and it is currently not possible to
> >> choose maxactive when writing to /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/kprobe_events
> >
> > I see, I found same issue last week...
> >
> >>
> >> The default maxactive can be as low as 1 on single-core with a
> >> non-preemptive kernel. This is too low and we need to increase it not
> >> only for recursive functions, but for functions that sleep or resched.
> >>
> >> This patch updates the format of the command that can be written to
> >> kprobe_events so that maxactive can be optionally specified.
> >
> > Good! this is completely same what I'm planning to add.
> >
> >>
> >> I need this for a bpf program attached to the kretprobe of
> >> inet_csk_accept, which can sleep for a long time.
> >
> > I'm also preparing another patch for using kmalloc(GFP_ATOMIC) in
> > kretprobe_pre_handler(), since this manual way is sometimes hard to
> > estimate how many instances needed. Anyway, since that may involve
> > unwilling memory allocation, this patch also needed.
>
> Where is that kretprobe_pre_handler()? I don't see any allocations in
> pre_handler_kretprobe().
pre_handler_kretprobe(), I'll send my patch, but note that I also considered
to introduce a patch which exactly same as yours. So even with my patch,
this patch should be introduced.
>
> >> BugLink: https://github.com/iovisor/bcc/issues/1072
> >
> > Could you also add Lukasz to Cc list, since he had reported an issue
> > related this one.
> >
> > https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-trace/msg00448.html
> >
> > Please see my comments below.
> >
> >> Signed-off-by: Alban Crequy <alban@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> Documentation/trace/kprobetrace.txt | 4 +++-
> >> kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> >> 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/Documentation/trace/kprobetrace.txt b/Documentation/trace/kprobetrace.txt
> >> index 41ef9d8..655ca7e 100644
> >> --- a/Documentation/trace/kprobetrace.txt
> >> +++ b/Documentation/trace/kprobetrace.txt
> >> @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ current_tracer. Instead of that, add probe points via
> >> Synopsis of kprobe_events
> >> -------------------------
> >> p[:[GRP/]EVENT] [MOD:]SYM[+offs]|MEMADDR [FETCHARGS] : Set a probe
> >> - r[:[GRP/]EVENT] [MOD:]SYM[+0] [FETCHARGS] : Set a return probe
> >> + r[MAXACTIVE][:[GRP/]EVENT] [MOD:]SYM[+0] [FETCHARGS] : Set a return probe
> >> -:[GRP/]EVENT : Clear a probe
> >>
> >> GRP : Group name. If omitted, use "kprobes" for it.
> >> @@ -32,6 +32,8 @@ Synopsis of kprobe_events
> >> MOD : Module name which has given SYM.
> >> SYM[+offs] : Symbol+offset where the probe is inserted.
> >> MEMADDR : Address where the probe is inserted.
> >> + MAXACTIVE : Maximum number of instances of the specified function that
> >> + can be probed simultaneously, or 0 for the default.(*)
> >
> > Here, yoy don't need (*), since [MAXACTIVE] is not a FETCHARGS.
>
> Why not? (*) refers to "(*) only for return probe." and the maxactive
> only makes sense for the kretprobe.
Because simply synopsis already explained MAXACTIVE is only for 'r' :)
The reason why I added the (*) note is that FETCHARGS are shown in
both synopsis of 'p' and 'r'.
>
> >> FETCHARGS : Arguments. Each probe can have up to 128 args.
> >> %REG : Fetch register REG
> >> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
> >> index 5f688cc..807e01c 100644
> >> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
> >> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
> >> @@ -282,6 +282,7 @@ static struct trace_kprobe *alloc_trace_kprobe(const char *group,
> >> void *addr,
> >> const char *symbol,
> >> unsigned long offs,
> >> + int maxactive,
> >> int nargs, bool is_return)
> >> {
> >> struct trace_kprobe *tk;
> >> @@ -309,6 +310,8 @@ static struct trace_kprobe *alloc_trace_kprobe(const char *group,
> >> else
> >> tk->rp.kp.pre_handler = kprobe_dispatcher;
> >>
> >> + tk->rp.maxactive = maxactive;
> >> +
> >> if (!event || !is_good_name(event)) {
> >> ret = -EINVAL;
> >> goto error;
> >> @@ -598,8 +601,10 @@ static int create_trace_kprobe(int argc, char **argv)
> >> {
> >> /*
> >> * Argument syntax:
> >> - * - Add kprobe: p[:[GRP/]EVENT] [MOD:]KSYM[+OFFS]|KADDR [FETCHARGS]
> >> - * - Add kretprobe: r[:[GRP/]EVENT] [MOD:]KSYM[+0] [FETCHARGS]
> >> + * - Add kprobe:
> >> + * p[:[GRP/]EVENT] [MOD:]KSYM[+OFFS]|KADDR [FETCHARGS]
> >> + * - Add kretprobe:
> >> + * r[MAXACTIVE][:[GRP/]EVENT] [MOD:]KSYM[+0] [FETCHARGS]
> >> * Fetch args:
> >> * $retval : fetch return value
> >> * $stack : fetch stack address
> >> @@ -619,6 +624,7 @@ static int create_trace_kprobe(int argc, char **argv)
> >> int i, ret = 0;
> >> bool is_return = false, is_delete = false;
> >> char *symbol = NULL, *event = NULL, *group = NULL;
> >> + int maxactive = 0;
> >> char *arg;
> >> unsigned long offset = 0;
> >> void *addr = NULL;
> >> @@ -637,8 +643,26 @@ static int create_trace_kprobe(int argc, char **argv)
> >> return -EINVAL;
> >> }
> >>
> >> - if (argv[0][1] == ':') {
> >> + if (is_return && isdigit(argv[0][1]) && strchr(&argv[0][1], ':')) {
> >
> > This only supports r[MAXACTIVE:[GRP/]EVENT]. e.g "r100" without event name.
> >
> > Thank you,
>
> Ok, I will fix this.
>
> By the way, the current code does not error out when there are extra characters:
> "pfuzz inet_csk_accept" is currently a valid command.
> I didn't change that.
OK, that is another improvement.
Thank you!
--
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>