Re: [PATCH V4 0/9] PM / Domains: Implement domain performance states
From: Viresh Kumar
Date: Wed Apr 12 2017 - 10:24:37 EST
On 20-03-17, 15:02, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The main feedback I got for the V3 series came from Kevin, who suggested
> that we should reuse OPP tables for genpd devices as well, instead of
> creating a new table type. And that's what this version is trying to do.
>
> Some platforms have the capability to configure the performance state of
> their power domains. The process of configuring the performance state is
> pretty much platform dependent and we may need to work with a wide range
> of configurables. For some platforms, like Qcom, it can be a positive
> integer value alone, while in other cases it can be voltage levels, etc.
>
> The power-domain framework until now was only designed for the idle
> state management of the device and this needs to change in order to
> reuse the power-domain framework for active state management of the
> devices.
Hi Ulf/Kevin,
Over 3 weeks since the time this version was posted :(
Can we get some reviews of this stuff and decide on how we are
supposed to proceed on this ?
Its getting delayed a lot unnecessarily. Thanks.
--
viresh