Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] uapi glibc compat: fix musl libc compatibility

[David Woodhouse]

On Fri, 2017-04-21 at 15:14 +0200, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
> 
> On 04/20/2017 10:36 PM, David Miller wrote:
> > 
> > From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 21:14:37 +0100
> > 
> > > 
> > > I agree, except I don't think you're going far enough. Those
> > > "standard
> > > names" you mention... some of this stuff actually depends on
> > > __GLIBC__,
> > > and *that* isn't right either.
> > Yep, that's something that needs correcting.
> > 
> Should all libc implementations define __GLIBC__ or could we at least
> switch the kernel UAPI to !__KERNEL__ here?

I'd start with the patch I referenced yesterday...

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature