Re: [musl] Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] uapi glibc compat: fix musl libc compatibility

[Rich Felker]

On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 03:14:21PM +0200, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
> 
> 
> On 04/20/2017 10:36 PM, David Miller wrote:
> > From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 21:14:37 +0100
> > 
> >> I agree, except I don't think you're going far enough. Those "standard
> >> names" you mention... some of this stuff actually depends on __GLIBC__,
> >> and *that* isn't right either.
> > 
> > Yep, that's something that needs correcting.
> > 
> Should all libc implementations define __GLIBC__

Absolutely not.

Rich