Re: [PATCH] usb: dwc3: Fix the USB 3.0 hub detection bug after warm boot

[Baolin Wang]

Hi,

On 13 July 2017 at 07:20, gustavo panizzo <gfa@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hello Wang
>
> thanks for your response
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 02:08:04PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 12 July 2017 at 11:52, gustavo panizzo <gfa@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> The dwc3 could not release resources when the module is built-in
>>> because this module does not have shutdown method. This causes the USB
>>> 3.0 hub is not able to detect after warm boot.
>>>
>>> Original patch by Brian Kim, updated and submitted upstream by gustavo
>>> panizzo.
>>>
>>> Also see https://bugs.debian.org/843448
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Brian Kim <brian.kim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Signed-off-by: gustavo panizzo <gfa@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>  1 file changed, 33 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c
>>> index 326b302fc440..f92dfe213d89 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c
>>> @@ -1259,6 +1259,38 @@ static int dwc3_probe(struct platform_device
>>> *pdev)
>>>         return ret;
>>>  }
>>>
>>> +static void dwc3_shutdown(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>> +{
>>> +       struct dwc3     *dwc = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>>> +       struct resource *res = platform_get_resource(pdev,
>>> IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
>>> +
>>> +       pm_runtime_get_sync(&pdev->dev);
>>> +       /*
>>> +        * restore res->start back to its original value so that, in case
>>> the
>>> +        * probe is deferred, we don't end up getting error in request
>>> the
>>> +        * memory region the next time probe is called.
>>> +        */
>>> +       res->start -= DWC3_GLOBALS_REGS_START;
>>> +
>>> +       dwc3_debugfs_exit(dwc);
>>> +       dwc3_core_exit_mode(dwc);
>>> +       dwc3_event_buffers_cleanup(dwc);
>
>
> What about dwc3_event_buffers_cleanup? should I remove it from
> dwc3_shutdown()?
> It is already in dwc3_core_exit()

I think so. We should avoid duplicate code.

>>> +       dwc3_free_event_buffers(dwc);
>>> +
>>> +       usb_phy_set_suspend(dwc->usb2_phy, 1);
>>> +       usb_phy_set_suspend(dwc->usb3_phy, 1);
>>> +
>>> +       phy_power_off(dwc->usb2_generic_phy);
>>> +       phy_power_off(dwc->usb3_generic_phy);
>>
>>
>> We've done these in dwc3_core_exit().
>>
>>> +
>>> +       dwc3_core_exit(dwc);
>>> +       dwc3_ulpi_exit(dwc);
>>> +
>>> +       pm_runtime_put_sync(&pdev->dev);
>>> +       pm_runtime_allow(&pdev->dev);
>>> +       pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>>  static int dwc3_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>  {
>>>         struct dwc3     *dwc = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>>> @@ -1488,6 +1520,7 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, dwc3_acpi_match);
>>>  static struct platform_driver dwc3_driver = {
>>>         .probe          = dwc3_probe,
>>>         .remove         = dwc3_remove,
>>> +       .shutdown       = dwc3_shutdown,
>>>         .driver         = {
>>>                 .name   = "dwc3",
>>>                 .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(of_dwc3_match),
>>> --
>>> 2.11.0
>>>
>>> --
>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
>>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Baolin.wang
>> Best Regards
>
>
> --
> IRC: gfa
> GPG: 0X44BB1BA79F6C6333
>



-- 
Baolin.wang
Best Regards