On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 06:11:08PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 11-08-17 18:04, Sean Paul wrote:
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 03:26:45PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 11-08-17 14:33, Cihangir Akturk wrote:
Use drm_*_get() and drm_*_put() helpers instead of drm_*_reference()
and drm_*_unreference() helpers.
drm_*_reference() and drm_*_unreference() functions are just
compatibility alias for drm_*_get() and drm_*_put() and should not be
used by new code. So convert all users of compatibility functions to
use the new APIs.
Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/api/drm-get-put.cocci
Signed-off-by: Cihangir Akturk <cakturk@xxxxxxxxx>
Thank you for doing this, looks good to me:
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
Applied to drm-misc-next, thank you for the review!
Erm vboxvideo is in staging, does this mean all patches for
it will now go through drm-misc-next despite it being in
staging (*) ? Because if some patches get merged through
drm-misc-next and some through Greg's staging repo that
is not going to end well.
-staging doesn't work for drm. And yes this patch needs to go in through
drm-misc I think (I don't want to be at Greg's mercy for merging cleanups,
same way we don't wait for driver maintainers if they don't merge the
patch in a timely fashion).
I'd say if no one is actually working on vbox cleanup (i.e. porting to
atomic) we'll throw it out next cycle again.