Re: [PATCH 0/1] devpts: use dynamic_dname() to generate proc name
From: Linus Torvalds
Date: Wed Aug 16 2017 - 14:48:54 EST
On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 11:26 AM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hardcoding "/dev/pts/%d" is something that user space can already do.
> The kernel can and should do better.
Put another way: there's no point in applying the patch as-is, since
existing glibc ptsname() does the same thing better and faster
entirely in user space.
Also, we already do special things to get a path for this, but it
clearly isn't working. See the
/* We need to cache a fake path for TIOCGPTPEER. */
comment in ptmx_open(). Why doesn't the file d_path get filled in
correctly there, I wonder.
Because The regular
readlink("/proc/self/fd/0", ...)
that 'tty' does works correctly. I think we've done something
incorrect in pty_open_peer(), which means that the fd path hasn't been
fully filled in.
Fixing that *should* fix the readlink() automatically, since it
clearly works for the 'tty' binary.
I'm wondering why it's not working as-is. "vfs_open()" does that
file->f_path = *path;
thing. Why aren't we getting the right path? The ptmx_open() code
looks ok to me.
Al, do you see what the issue is, and why we don't get a proper path
on that readlink?
Linus