Re: [PATCH] USB: serial: option: simplify 3 D-Link device entries

[Johan Hovold]

On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 04:41:21PM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 10:45:13AM +0200, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> > All the vendor specific interfaces on these devices are serial
> > functions handled by this driver, so we can use a single class
> > match entry for each.
> > 
> >  P:  Vendor=2001 ProdID=7d01 Rev= 3.00
> >  S:  Manufacturer=D-Link,Inc
> >  S:  Product=D-Link DWM-156
> >  C:* #Ifs= 7 Cfg#= 1 Atr=a0 MxPwr=500mA
> >  A:  FirstIf#= 0 IfCount= 2 Cls=02(comm.) Sub=0e Prot=00
> >  I:* If#= 0 Alt= 0 #EPs= 1 Cls=02(comm.) Sub=0e Prot=00 Driver=cdc_mbim
> >  E:  Ad=88(I) Atr=03(Int.) MxPS=  64 Ivl=125us
> >  I:  If#= 1 Alt= 0 #EPs= 0 Cls=0a(data ) Sub=00 Prot=02 Driver=cdc_mbim
> >  I:* If#= 1 Alt= 1 #EPs= 2 Cls=0a(data ) Sub=00 Prot=02 Driver=cdc_mbim
> >  E:  Ad=81(I) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS= 512 Ivl=0ms
> >  E:  Ad=01(O) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS= 512 Ivl=0ms
> >  I:* If#= 2 Alt= 0 #EPs= 3 Cls=ff(vend.) Sub=02 Prot=01 Driver=option
> >  E:  Ad=87(I) Atr=03(Int.) MxPS=  64 Ivl=500us
> >  E:  Ad=82(I) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS= 512 Ivl=0ms
> >  E:  Ad=02(O) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS= 512 Ivl=0ms
> >  I:* If#= 3 Alt= 0 #EPs= 2 Cls=ff(vend.) Sub=00 Prot=00 Driver=option
> >  E:  Ad=83(I) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS= 512 Ivl=0ms
> >  E:  Ad=03(O) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS= 512 Ivl=0ms
> >  I:* If#= 4 Alt= 0 #EPs= 2 Cls=ff(vend.) Sub=00 Prot=00 Driver=option
> >  E:  Ad=84(I) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS= 512 Ivl=0ms
> >  E:  Ad=04(O) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS= 512 Ivl=0ms
> >  I:* If#= 5 Alt= 0 #EPs= 2 Cls=ff(vend.) Sub=00 Prot=00 Driver=option
> >  E:  Ad=85(I) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS= 512 Ivl=0ms
> >  E:  Ad=05(O) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS= 512 Ivl=0ms
> >  I:* If#= 6 Alt= 0 #EPs= 2 Cls=08(stor.) Sub=06 Prot=50 Driver=usb-storage
> >  E:  Ad=86(I) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS= 512 Ivl=0ms
> >  E:  Ad=06(O) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS= 512 Ivl=0ms
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Bjørn Mork <bjorn@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > 
> > Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > 
> > > Do you want to submit a patch or should I do it?
> > 
> > Well, I can save you that job if this is fine with you.  Feel
> > free to add a stable cc if you think it is appropriate.  I am not
> > sure...
> 
> Thanks! Yeah, not sure about stable either. Maybe I'll just apply this
> one on top the new entry coming in, and we can defer the decision to the
> stable maintainers next time there's a backport conflict.

Now applied (without stable-CC).

Thanks,
Johan