Re: [PATCH 1/2] i2c: designware: switch to suspend_late/resume_early

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 4:11 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thursday, September 21, 2017 3:13:56 AM CEST Rajat Jain wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 5:24 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 12:31 AM, Rajat Jain <rajatja@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >> Ref: https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/9/19/649
>> >>
>> >> The bus controllers should suspend the bus operations only after
>> >> all of the devices on the bus have suspended their device
>> >> completely. Since the i2c_client drivers could be talking to
>> >> their devices in their suspend_late() calls, lets ensure that the
>> >> bus is alive by that time. Thus moving the controller suspend logic to
>> >> suspend_late().
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Rajat Jain <rajatja@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> ---
>> >>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c | 2 +-
>> >>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> >>
>> >> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
>> >> index 0e65b97842b4..66dd7f844c40 100644
>> >> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
>> >> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
>> >> @@ -468,7 +468,7 @@ static int dw_i2c_plat_suspend(struct device *dev)
>> >>  static const struct dev_pm_ops dw_i2c_dev_pm_ops = {
>> >>         .prepare = dw_i2c_plat_prepare,
>> >>         .complete = dw_i2c_plat_complete,
>> >> -       SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(dw_i2c_plat_suspend, dw_i2c_plat_resume)
>> >> +       SET_LATE_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(dw_i2c_plat_suspend, dw_i2c_plat_resume)
>> >>         SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(dw_i2c_plat_runtime_suspend,
>> >>                            dw_i2c_plat_resume,
>> >>                            NULL)
>> >
>> > No, you can't just do that.
>> >
>> > I sent patches to do it properly before my trip to LA last week, it
>> > shouldn't be overly difficult to find them in the mailing list
>> > archives.  I can look them up tomorrow if need be.
>>
>> Thanks, I am guessing you mean this?
>>
>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9939807/
>
> Yes, that's what I mean.

BTW, does this patchset work for you?

Thanks,
Rafael