Re: [PATCH 1/2] i2c: designware: switch to suspend_late/resume_early

[Rajat Jain]

On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 5:55 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 4:11 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Thursday, September 21, 2017 3:13:56 AM CEST Rajat Jain wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 5:24 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> > On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 12:31 AM, Rajat Jain <rajatja@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> >> Ref: https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/9/19/649
>>> >>
>>> >> The bus controllers should suspend the bus operations only after
>>> >> all of the devices on the bus have suspended their device
>>> >> completely. Since the i2c_client drivers could be talking to
>>> >> their devices in their suspend_late() calls, lets ensure that the
>>> >> bus is alive by that time. Thus moving the controller suspend logic to
>>> >> suspend_late().
>>> >>
>>> >> Signed-off-by: Rajat Jain <rajatja@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> >> ---
>>> >>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c | 2 +-
>>> >>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>> >>
>>> >> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
>>> >> index 0e65b97842b4..66dd7f844c40 100644
>>> >> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
>>> >> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
>>> >> @@ -468,7 +468,7 @@ static int dw_i2c_plat_suspend(struct device *dev)
>>> >>  static const struct dev_pm_ops dw_i2c_dev_pm_ops = {
>>> >>         .prepare = dw_i2c_plat_prepare,
>>> >>         .complete = dw_i2c_plat_complete,
>>> >> -       SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(dw_i2c_plat_suspend, dw_i2c_plat_resume)
>>> >> +       SET_LATE_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(dw_i2c_plat_suspend, dw_i2c_plat_resume)
>>> >>         SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(dw_i2c_plat_runtime_suspend,
>>> >>                            dw_i2c_plat_resume,
>>> >>                            NULL)
>>> >
>>> > No, you can't just do that.
>>> >
>>> > I sent patches to do it properly before my trip to LA last week, it
>>> > shouldn't be overly difficult to find them in the mailing list
>>> > archives.  I can look them up tomorrow if need be.
>>>
>>> Thanks, I am guessing you mean this?
>>>
>>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9939807/
>>
>> Yes, that's what I mean.
>
> BTW, does this patchset work for you?

Yes, I don't see the issue I was seeing earlier with your patch.
Please feel free to add

Tested-by: Rajat Jain <rajatja@xxxxxxxxxx>

>
> Thanks,
> Rafael