[PATCH 4.9 103/105] ext4: dont allow encrypted operations without keys

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx>

commit 173b8439e1ba362007315868928bf9d26e5cc5a6 upstream.

While we allow deletes without the key, the following should not be
permitted:

# cd /vdc/encrypted-dir-without-key
# ls -l
total 4
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root   0 Dec 27 22:35 6,LKNRJsp209FbXoSvJWzB
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 286 Dec 27 22:35 uRJ5vJh9gE7vcomYMqTAyD
# mv uRJ5vJh9gE7vcomYMqTAyD  6,LKNRJsp209FbXoSvJWzB

Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
 fs/ext4/namei.c |   12 ++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)

--- a/fs/ext4/namei.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/namei.c
@@ -3527,6 +3527,12 @@ static int ext4_rename(struct inode *old
 			EXT4_I(old_dentry->d_inode)->i_projid)))
 		return -EXDEV;
 
+	if ((ext4_encrypted_inode(old_dir) &&
+	     !fscrypt_has_encryption_key(old_dir)) ||
+	    (ext4_encrypted_inode(new_dir) &&
+	     !fscrypt_has_encryption_key(new_dir)))
+		return -ENOKEY;
+
 	retval = dquot_initialize(old.dir);
 	if (retval)
 		return retval;
@@ -3726,6 +3732,12 @@ static int ext4_cross_rename(struct inod
 	u8 new_file_type;
 	int retval;
 
+	if ((ext4_encrypted_inode(old_dir) &&
+	     !fscrypt_has_encryption_key(old_dir)) ||
+	    (ext4_encrypted_inode(new_dir) &&
+	     !fscrypt_has_encryption_key(new_dir)))
+		return -ENOKEY;
+
 	if ((ext4_encrypted_inode(old_dir) ||
 	     ext4_encrypted_inode(new_dir)) &&
 	    (old_dir != new_dir) &&