[PATCH 4.9 104/105] f2fs: dont allow encrypted operations without keys

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@xxxxxxxxxx>

commit 363fa4e078cbdc97a172c19d19dc04b41b52ebc8 upstream.

This patch fixes the renaming bug on encrypted filenames, which was pointed by

 (ext4: don't allow encrypted operations without keys)

Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
 fs/f2fs/namei.c |   12 ++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)

--- a/fs/f2fs/namei.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/namei.c
@@ -663,6 +663,12 @@ static int f2fs_rename(struct inode *old
 	bool is_old_inline = f2fs_has_inline_dentry(old_dir);
 	int err = -ENOENT;
 
+	if ((f2fs_encrypted_inode(old_dir) &&
+			!fscrypt_has_encryption_key(old_dir)) ||
+			(f2fs_encrypted_inode(new_dir) &&
+			!fscrypt_has_encryption_key(new_dir)))
+		return -ENOKEY;
+
 	if ((old_dir != new_dir) && f2fs_encrypted_inode(new_dir) &&
 			!fscrypt_has_permitted_context(new_dir, old_inode)) {
 		err = -EPERM;
@@ -843,6 +849,12 @@ static int f2fs_cross_rename(struct inod
 	int old_nlink = 0, new_nlink = 0;
 	int err = -ENOENT;
 
+	if ((f2fs_encrypted_inode(old_dir) &&
+			!fscrypt_has_encryption_key(old_dir)) ||
+			(f2fs_encrypted_inode(new_dir) &&
+			!fscrypt_has_encryption_key(new_dir)))
+		return -ENOKEY;
+
 	if ((f2fs_encrypted_inode(old_dir) || f2fs_encrypted_inode(new_dir)) &&
 			(old_dir != new_dir) &&
 			(!fscrypt_has_permitted_context(new_dir, old_inode) ||