Re: [PATCH 17/20] staging: lustre: ldlm: mark expected switch fall-through

[Dilger, Andreas]

On Oct 12, 2017, at 10:17, Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
> where we are expecting to fall through.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@xxxxxxxxx>

> ---
> drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_request.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_request.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_request.c
> index f3bf238..6943987 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_request.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_request.c
> @@ -1175,6 +1175,7 @@ ldlm_cancel_no_wait_policy(struct ldlm_namespace *ns, struct ldlm_lock *lock,
> 	case LDLM_IBITS:
> 		if (ns->ns_cancel && ns->ns_cancel(lock) != 0)
> 			break;
> +		/* fall through */
> 	default:
> 		result = LDLM_POLICY_SKIP_LOCK;
> 		lock_res_and_lock(lock);
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 

Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Lustre Principal Architect
Intel Corporation