Re: [PATCH 19/20] staging: lustre: ptlrpc: mark expected switch fall-throughs
From: Dilger, Andreas
Date: Tue Oct 17 2017 - 19:04:08 EST
On Oct 12, 2017, at 10:17, Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
> where we are expecting to fall through.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/pack_generic.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/pack_generic.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/pack_generic.c
> index aad4ff1..a3664c1 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/pack_generic.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/pack_generic.c
> @@ -786,7 +786,7 @@ __u32 lustre_msg_get_flags(struct lustre_msg *msg)
>
> CERROR("invalid msg %p: no ptlrpc body!\n", msg);
> }
> - /* no break */
> + /* fall through */
> default:
> /* flags might be printed in debug code while message
> * uninitialized
> @@ -854,7 +854,7 @@ __u32 lustre_msg_get_op_flags(struct lustre_msg *msg)
>
> CERROR("invalid msg %p: no ptlrpc body!\n", msg);
> }
> - /* no break */
> + /* fall through */
> default:
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -1035,7 +1035,7 @@ int lustre_msg_get_status(struct lustre_msg *msg)
>
> CERROR("invalid msg %p: no ptlrpc body!\n", msg);
> }
> - /* no break */
> + /* fall through */
> default:
> /* status might be printed in debug code while message
> * uninitialized
> --
> 2.7.4
>
Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Lustre Principal Architect
Intel Corporation