Re: [PATCH] net: rxrpc: mark expected switch fall-throughs

[David Howells]

Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > No.  Firstly, it should be 'F'; secondly, don't remove the blank line - it's
> > there for a reason.
> >
> 
> What is the reason?

Visual separation.

David