Re: [PATCH] iio/proximity/srf08: Improve unlocking of a mutex in srf08_read_ranging()

[Jonathan Cameron]

On Thu, 26 Oct 2017 17:00:07 +0200
SF Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 16:51:08 +0200
> 
> Add a jump target so that a call of the function "mutex_unlock" is stored
> only once at the end of this function implementation.
> Replace two calls by goto statements.
> 
> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

This simple case is a reasonable change.  A few minor points though.
Firstly, for a given subsystem please look at other patches to identify
the standard formatting used in patch titles.

Secondly make sure you don't make unconnected changes.  Here there
is a whitespace change that should not be here.

Jonathan
> ---
>  drivers/iio/proximity/srf08.c | 14 +++++---------
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/proximity/srf08.c b/drivers/iio/proximity/srf08.c
> index f2bf783f829a..85957550195b 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/proximity/srf08.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/proximity/srf08.c
> @@ -135,8 +135,7 @@ static int srf08_read_ranging(struct srf08_data *data)
>  			SRF08_WRITE_COMMAND, SRF08_CMD_RANGING_CM);
>  	if (ret < 0) {
>  		dev_err(&client->dev, "write command - err: %d\n", ret);
> -		mutex_unlock(&data->lock);
> -		return ret;
> +		goto unlock;
>  	}
>  
>  	/*
> @@ -163,20 +162,17 @@ static int srf08_read_ranging(struct srf08_data *data)
>  
>  	if (ret >= 255 || ret <= 0) {
>  		dev_err(&client->dev, "device not ready\n");
> -		mutex_unlock(&data->lock);
> -		return -EIO;
> +		ret = -EIO;
> +		goto unlock;
>  	}
>  
>  	ret = i2c_smbus_read_word_swapped(data->client,
>  						SRF08_READ_ECHO_1_HIGH);
> -	if (ret < 0) {
> +	if (ret < 0)
>  		dev_err(&client->dev, "cannot read distance: ret=%d\n", ret);
> -		mutex_unlock(&data->lock);
> -		return ret;
> -	}
>  
> +unlock:
>  	mutex_unlock(&data->lock);
> -

Please don't make unconnected white space changes.

>  	return ret;
>  }
>