Re: watchdog: watchdog_dev: mark expected switch fall-through

[Guenter Roeck]

On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 06:03:27PM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
> where we are expecting to fall through.
> 
> Notice that in this particular case I replaced "Fall" with a proper
> "fall through" comment, which is what GCC is expecting to find.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

> ---
>  drivers/watchdog/watchdog_dev.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/watchdog_dev.c b/drivers/watchdog/watchdog_dev.c
> index 1e971a5..a79ad5b 100644
> --- a/drivers/watchdog/watchdog_dev.c
> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/watchdog_dev.c
> @@ -720,7 +720,7 @@ static long watchdog_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
>  		err = watchdog_ping(wdd);
>  		if (err < 0)
>  			break;
> -		/* Fall */
> +		/* fall through */
>  	case WDIOC_GETTIMEOUT:
>  		/* timeout == 0 means that we don't know the timeout */
>  		if (wdd->timeout == 0) {