Re: [PATCH v9 44/51] selftest/vm: powerpc implementation for generic abstraction

[Ram Pai]

On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 04:47:15PM -0200, Breno Leitao wrote:
> Hi Ram,
> 
> On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 12:57:36AM -0800, Ram Pai wrote:
> > @@ -206,12 +209,14 @@ void signal_handler(int signum, siginfo_t *si, void *vucontext)
> >  
> >  	trapno = uctxt->uc_mcontext.gregs[REG_TRAPNO];
> >  	ip = uctxt->uc_mcontext.gregs[REG_IP_IDX];
> > -	fpregset = uctxt->uc_mcontext.fpregs;
> > -	fpregs = (void *)fpregset;
> 
> Since you removed all references for fpregset now, you probably want to
> remove the declaration of the variable above.

fpregs is still needed.

> 
> > @@ -219,20 +224,21 @@ void signal_handler(int signum, siginfo_t *si, void *vucontext)
> >  	 * state.  We just assume that it is here.
> >  	 */
> >  	fpregs += 0x70;
> > -#endif
> > -	pkey_reg_offset = pkey_reg_xstate_offset();
> 
> With this code, you removed all the reference for variable
> pkey_reg_offset, thus, its declaration could be removed also.

yes. will fix it.

> 
> > -	*(u64 *)pkey_reg_ptr = 0x00000000;
> > +	dprintf1("si_pkey from siginfo: %lx\n", si_pkey);
> > +#if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__) /* arch */
> > +	dprintf1("signal pkey_reg from xsave: %016lx\n", *pkey_reg_ptr);
> > +	*(u64 *)pkey_reg_ptr &= reset_bits(si_pkey, PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS);
> > +#elif __powerpc64__
> 
> Since the variable pkey_reg_ptr is only used for Intel code (inside
> #ifdefs), you probably want to #ifdef the variable declaration also,
> avoid triggering "unused variable" warning on non-Intel machines.

yes. Actually it will trigger the warning on intel machines. Fixed it.

Thanks Breno!
RP