Re: [PATCH v3] Staging: pi433: fix brace coding style issues in pi433_if.c

[Greg KH]

On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 11:31:15AM -0800, Tomas Marek wrote:
> On 12/13/2017 03:55 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> 
> > On Sat, Dec 09, 2017 at 12:41:11PM -0800, Tomas Marek wrote:
> >> This patch fix several brace on next line, braces not necessary, space
> >> around =/<, and space before/after open/close parenthesis coding style
> >> errors find by checkpatch in pi433_if.c.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Tomas Marek <marek_tomas@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> Changes in v3:
> >>   - DIO0_irq_handler update reverted - will be submitted in separate
> >>     patch for the sake of clarity.
> >> Changes in v2:
> >>   - DIO0_irq_handler updated - 'if/else if' replaced by 'switch' and
> >>     'dev_dbg_ratelimited' used instead of 'dev_dbg' according to Joe
> >>     Perches suggestion.
> >>   - The removal of braces around SET_CHECKED() reverted - caused syntax
> >>     error and is addressed by another patch
> >>     "[PATCHv2] staging: pi433: pi433_if.c remove SET_CHECKED macro".
> > This doesn't apply to my tree at all :(
> >
> > Please rebase it against the staging-next branch of staging.git (or the
> > staging-testing branch to be sure), and then resend.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
> I am sorry for complications. I did it against linux-next. I'll rebase it
> against stating and cross-check against staging-testing, hopefully it will
> be fine then.

Normally linux-next is fine to do your work against.  But as you can see
on the mailing list, there are a lot of people sending a lot of patches
for this one driver.  So things end up changing quickly, usually the
merge issue is that I took a patch that was sent a few hours before
yours, and you did it all right.

Sorry, rebasing and resending patches are just a normal mode for working
on a high-traffic area in the kernel, thanks for your patience.

greg k-h