Re: [PATCH] arm: imx: suspend/resume: use outer_disable/resume

[Shawn Guo]

On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 06:52:45AM +0000, Peng Fan wrote:
> Hi Shawn,
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Shawn Guo [mailto:shawnguo@xxxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 26, 2017 11:31 AM
> > To: Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx>
> > Cc: A.s. Dong <aisheng.dong@xxxxxxx>; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Russell
> > King <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@xxxxxxx>;
> > Sascha Hauer <kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; van.freenix@xxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-
> > kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm: imx: suspend/resume: use outer_disable/resume
> > 
> > On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 08:07:18PM +0800, Peng Fan wrote:
> > > Use outer_disable/resume for suspend/resume.
> > > With the two APIs used, code could be simplified and easy to extend to
> > > introduce l2c_write_sec for i.MX platforms when moving Linux Kernel
> > > runs in non-secure world.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Sascha Hauer <kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@xxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Russell King <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@xxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  arch/arm/mach-imx/pm-imx6.c      |  2 ++
> > >  arch/arm/mach-imx/suspend-imx6.S | 24 ------------------------
> > 
> > I'm fine with the patch in general.  But this piece of code is running on a few
> > i.MX6 platforms, and I'm wondering on which SoCs you have verified the
> > change work fine.
> 
> I tested it on 6Q-SDB board. Is it ok?

Okay, I will get it into linux-next for a bit wider testing.

Shawn