[PATCH] nfs/super: check NFS_CAP_ACLS instead of the NFS version

[Max Kellermann]

This sets MS_POSIXACL only if ACL support is really enabled, instead
of always setting MS_POSIXACL if the NFS protocol version
theoretically supports ACL.

The code comment says "We will [apply the umask] ourselves", but that
happens in posix_acl_create() only if the kernel has POSIX ACL
support.  Without it, posix_acl_create() is an empty dummy function.

So let's not pretend we will apply the umask if we can already know
that we will never.

This fixes a problem where the umask is always ignored in the NFS
client when compiled without CONFIG_FS_POSIX_ACL.  This is a 4 year
old regression caused by commit 013cdf1088d723 which itself was not
completely wrong, but failed to consider all the side effects by
misdesigned VFS code.

Signed-off-by: Max Kellermann <mk@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/nfs/super.c |    7 +++++--
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/nfs/super.c b/fs/nfs/super.c
index 29bacdc56f6a..fa9929723bfe 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/super.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/super.c
@@ -2345,11 +2345,14 @@ void nfs_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, struct nfs_mount_info *mount_info)
 	if (data && data->bsize)
 		sb->s_blocksize = nfs_block_size(data->bsize, &sb->s_blocksize_bits);
 
-	if (server->nfs_client->rpc_ops->version != 2) {
+	if (NFS_SB(sb)->caps & NFS_CAP_ACLS) {
 		/* The VFS shouldn't apply the umask to mode bits. We will do
 		 * so ourselves when necessary.
 		 */
 		sb->s_flags |= SB_POSIXACL;
+	}
+
+	if (server->nfs_client->rpc_ops->version != 2) {
 		sb->s_time_gran = 1;
 		sb->s_export_op = &nfs_export_ops;
 	}
@@ -2375,7 +2378,7 @@ static void nfs_clone_super(struct super_block *sb,
 	sb->s_time_gran = 1;
 	sb->s_export_op = old_sb->s_export_op;
 
-	if (server->nfs_client->rpc_ops->version != 2) {
+	if (NFS_SB(sb)->caps & NFS_CAP_ACLS) {
 		/* The VFS shouldn't apply the umask to mode bits. We will do
 		 * so ourselves when necessary.
 		 */