Re: [PATCH v5 11/44] clk: davinci: Add platform information for TI DA830 PSC
From: David Lechner
Date: Tue Jan 16 2018 - 12:16:46 EST
On 01/16/2018 07:38 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
On Monday 08 January 2018 07:47 AM, David Lechner wrote:
This adds platform-specific declarations for the PSC clocks on TI DA830/
OMAP-L137/AM17XX SoCs.
Signed-off-by: David Lechner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/clk/davinci/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/clk/davinci/psc-da830.c | 96 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/clk/davinci.h | 2 +
3 files changed, 99 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 drivers/clk/davinci/psc-da830.c
diff --git a/drivers/clk/davinci/Makefile b/drivers/clk/davinci/Makefile
index cd1bf2c..fb14c8c 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/davinci/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/clk/davinci/Makefile
@@ -10,4 +10,5 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DM644x) += pll-dm644x.o
obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DM646x) += pll-dm646x.o
obj-y += psc.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DA830) += psc-da830.o
endif
diff --git a/drivers/clk/davinci/psc-da830.c b/drivers/clk/davinci/psc-da830.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..193b08f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/clk/davinci/psc-da830.c
@@ -0,0 +1,96 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * PSC clock descriptions for TI DA830/OMAP-L137/AM17XX
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2017 David Lechner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
+ */
+
+#include <linux/clk-provider.h>
+#include <linux/clkdev.h>
+#include <linux/init.h>
+#include <linux/types.h>
+
+#include "psc.h"
+
+static const struct davinci_psc_clk_info da830_psc0_info[] __initconst = {
+ LPSC(0, 0, tpcc, pll0_sysclk2, LPSC_ALWAYS_ENABLED),
+ LPSC(1, 0, tptc0, pll0_sysclk2, LPSC_ALWAYS_ENABLED),
+ LPSC(2, 0, tptc1, pll0_sysclk2, LPSC_ALWAYS_ENABLED),
+ LPSC(3, 0, aemif, pll0_sysclk3, LPSC_ALWAYS_ENABLED),
+ LPSC(4, 0, spi0, pll0_sysclk2, 0),
+ LPSC(5, 0, mmcsd, pll0_sysclk2, 0),
+ LPSC(6, 0, aintc, pll0_sysclk4, LPSC_ALWAYS_ENABLED),
+ LPSC(7, 0, arm_rom, pll0_sysclk2, LPSC_ALWAYS_ENABLED),
+ LPSC(8, 0, secu_mgr, pll0_sysclk4, LPSC_ALWAYS_ENABLED),
+ LPSC(9, 0, uart0, pll0_sysclk2, 0),
+ LPSC(10, 0, scr0_ss, pll0_sysclk2, LPSC_ALWAYS_ENABLED),
+ LPSC(11, 0, scr1_ss, pll0_sysclk2, LPSC_ALWAYS_ENABLED),
+ LPSC(12, 0, scr2_ss, pll0_sysclk2, LPSC_ALWAYS_ENABLED),
+ LPSC(13, 0, dmax, pll0_sysclk2, LPSC_ALWAYS_ENABLED),
pruss is better (I know the name is coming from existing code).
+ LPSC(14, 0, arm, pll0_sysclk6, LPSC_ALWAYS_ENABLED),
This is LPSC 15 which controls DSP too. But its missing from existing
code. Not sure why. Probably a note for future. For now okay with
ignoring it.
+ { }
+};
Tables like these are much easier to parse if columns are spaced using a
tab.
Tabs make the lines over 80 columns. How about spaces instead?
+
+static const struct davinci_psc_clk_info da830_psc1_info[] __initconst = {
+ LPSC(1, 0, usb0, pll0_sysclk2, 0),
+ LPSC(2, 0, usb1, pll0_sysclk4, 0),
+ LPSC(3, 0, gpio, pll0_sysclk4, 0),
There is LPSC 4 controlling UHPI. Again, lets ignore for now.
+ LPSC(5, 0, emac, pll0_sysclk4, 0),
+ LPSC(6, 0, emif3, pll0_sysclk5, LPSC_ALWAYS_ENABLED),
+ LPSC(7, 0, mcasp0, pll0_sysclk2, 0),
+ LPSC(8, 0, mcasp1, pll0_sysclk2, 0),
+ LPSC(9, 0, mcasp2, pll0_sysclk2, 0),
+ LPSC(10, 0, spi1, pll0_sysclk2, 0),
+ LPSC(11, 0, i2c1, pll0_sysclk4, 0),
+ LPSC(12, 0, uart1, pll0_sysclk2, 0),
+ LPSC(13, 0, uart2, pll0_sysclk2, 0),
+ LPSC(16, 0, lcdc, pll0_sysclk2, 0),
+ LPSC(17, 0, pwm, pll0_sysclk2, 0),
+ LPSC(20, 0, ecap, pll0_sysclk2, 0),
+ LPSC(21, 0, eqep, pll0_sysclk2, 0),
+ { }
+};
+
+void __init da830_psc_clk_init(void __iomem *psc0, void __iomem *psc1)
+{
+ struct clk_onecell_data *clk_data;
+
+ clk_data = davinci_psc_register_clocks(psc0, da830_psc0_info, 16);
+ if (!clk_data)
+ return;
+
+ clk_register_clkdev(clk_data->clks[4], NULL, "spi_davinci.0");
+ clk_register_clkdev(clk_data->clks[5], NULL, "da830-mmc.0");
+ clk_register_clkdev(clk_data->clks[9], NULL, "serial8250.0");
+ clk_register_clkdev(clk_data->clks[14], "arm", NULL);
+
+ clk_free_onecell_data(clk_data);
+
+ clk_data = davinci_psc_register_clocks(psc1, da830_psc1_info, 32);
+ if (!clk_data)
+ return;
+
+ clk_register_clkdev(clk_data->clks[1], NULL, "musb-da8xx");
+ clk_register_clkdev(clk_data->clks[1], NULL, "cppi41-dmaengine");
+ clk_register_clkdev(clk_data->clks[2], NULL, "ohci-da8xx");
+ clk_register_clkdev(clk_data->clks[3], "gpio", NULL);
This is pretty bad (and no fault of yours) - having a con_id but no
device name. Can you please make a pre-series which passes NULL con_id
in gpio-davinci.c?
I'll give it a try. This is complicated by the fact that the con_id has
made it's way into the device tree bindings. However, I think we can
safely deprecate clock-names = "gpio" in the device tree bindings since
we can make the driver ignore that property to preserve backwards
compatibility.
+ clk_register_clkdev(clk_data->clks[5], NULL, "davinci_emac.1");
+ clk_register_clkdev(clk_data->clks[5], "fck", "davinci_mdio.0");
+ clk_register_clkdev(clk_data->clks[7], NULL, "davinci-mcasp.0");
+ clk_register_clkdev(clk_data->clks[8], NULL, "davinci-mcasp.1");
+ clk_register_clkdev(clk_data->clks[9], NULL, "davinci-mcasp.2");
+ clk_register_clkdev(clk_data->clks[10], NULL, "spi_davinci.1");
+ clk_register_clkdev(clk_data->clks[11], NULL, "i2c_davinci.2");
+ clk_register_clkdev(clk_data->clks[12], NULL, "serial8250.1");
+ clk_register_clkdev(clk_data->clks[13], NULL, "serial8250.2");
+ clk_register_clkdev(clk_data->clks[16], "fck", "da8xx_lcdc.0");
+ clk_register_clkdev(clk_data->clks[17], "fck", "ehrpwm.0");
+ clk_register_clkdev(clk_data->clks[17], "fck", "ehrpwm.1");
+ clk_register_clkdev(clk_data->clks[20], "fck", "ecap.0");
+ clk_register_clkdev(clk_data->clks[20], "fck", "ecap.1");
+ clk_register_clkdev(clk_data->clks[20], "fck", "ecap.2");
+ clk_register_clkdev(clk_data->clks[21], NULL, "eqep.0");
+ clk_register_clkdev(clk_data->clks[21], NULL, "eqep.1");
This is going to be very difficult to audit for mistakes. How do you
feel about adding the con_id and dev_id to davinci_psc_clk_info[] so
they can be initialized as part of a single static table? And then here
you go over the table looking for non-NULL con_id/dev_id to call
clk_register_clkdev()?
I am guessing you did not take that route because the DT path does not
need those. But still, I think that will be much less error prone.
I wasn't really happy with this either, but I haven't come up with
anything better. The reason I think this is good enough is that the
array index is the LPSC number, so it is not actually that hard to
audit. You can use the clock declarations above (or the datasheet/
TRM) to know exactly which clock you are dealing with by matching
the array index. I considered using macros instead of the numbers,
but then lines are over 80 columns and it gets hard to read with
wrapped lines.
Any other solution will be much more verbose and require helper
functions for looping through the clocks. I'm thinking that I would
define a list of con_id, dev_id pairs for each clock, so that would
be 15 extra static arrays here.
I'll think about it a little more, but for now, I would like to push
for just calling this "good enough" and leave it as-is.