RE: [PATCH v2] retpoline/module: Warn for missing retpoline in module

[Van De Ven, Arjan]

> I just sent a v3 that changes the VERMAGIC only, based on Greg's
> earlier feedback.
> 
> It has the drawbacks that it:
> - refuses loading instead of warns
> - doesn't stop refusing when the feature is runtime disabled
> 
> But it's much simpler, just a few lines of ifdef.

I think simple is good at this point