Re: [PATCH v2] retpoline/module: Warn for missing retpoline in module

[Thomas Gleixner]

On Tue, 16 Jan 2018, Andi Kleen wrote:

> Thanks.
> 
> I just sent a v3 that changes the VERMAGIC only, based on Greg's 
> earlier feedback.
> 
> It has the drawbacks that it:
> - refuses loading instead of warns
> - doesn't stop refusing when the feature is runtime disabled
> 
> But it's much simpler, just a few lines of ifdef.
> 
> We can either go with the v3, or rework this one into a v4?

V3 is fine. Not loading is the right thing to do :)

Thanks,

	tglx