Re: [PATCH] bpf, doc: Correct one wrong value in "Register value tracking"
From: Daniel Borkmann
Date: Wed Jan 24 2018 - 10:44:23 EST
On 01/24/2018 08:48 AM, Wang YanQing wrote:
> If we then OR this with 0x40, then the value of 6th bit (0th is first bit)
> become known, so the right mask is 0xbf instead of 0xcf.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wang YanQing <udknight@xxxxxxxxx>
Applied to bpf-next, thanks Wang!