Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] sched: Stop nohz stats when decayed
From: Vincent Guittot
Date: Fri Feb 16 2018 - 08:44:32 EST
On 16 February 2018 at 13:13, Valentin Schneider
<valentin.schneider@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 02/14/2018 03:26 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>> Stopped the periodic update of blocked load when all idle CPUs have fully
>> decayed. We introduce a new nohz.has_blocked that reflect if some idle
>> CPUs has blocked load that have to be periodiccally updated. nohz.has_blocked
>> is set everytime that a Idle CPU can have blocked load and it is then clear
>> when no more blocked load has been detected during an update. We don't need
>> atomic operation but only to make cure of the right ordering when updating
>> nohz.idle_cpus_mask and nohz.has_blocked.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> kernel/sched/fair.c | 122 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>> kernel/sched/sched.h | 1 +
>> 2 files changed, 102 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
>> index 7af1fa9..5a6835e 100644
>> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
>> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
>>
>> [...]
>>> @@ -9374,6 +9427,22 @@ static bool nohz_idle_balance(struct rq *this_rq, enum cpu_idle_type idle)
>>
>> SCHED_WARN_ON((flags & NOHZ_KICK_MASK) == NOHZ_BALANCE_KICK);
>>
>> + /*
>> + * We assume there will be no idle load after this update and clear
>> + * the has_blocked flag. If a cpu enters idle in the mean time, it will
>> + * set the has_blocked flag and trig another update of idle load.
>> + * Because a cpu that becomes idle, is added to idle_cpus_mask before
>> + * setting the flag, we are sure to not clear the state and not
>> + * check the load of an idle cpu.
>> + */
>> + WRITE_ONCE(nohz.has_blocked, 0);
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Ensures that if we miss the CPU, we must see the has_blocked
>> + * store from nohz_balance_enter_idle().
>> + */
>> + smp_mb();
>> +
>> for_each_cpu(balance_cpu, nohz.idle_cpus_mask) {
>> if (balance_cpu == this_cpu || !idle_cpu(balance_cpu))
>> continue;
>> @@ -9383,11 +9452,16 @@ static bool nohz_idle_balance(struct rq *this_rq, enum cpu_idle_type idle)
>> * work being done for other cpus. Next load
>> * balancing owner will pick it up.
>> */
>> - if (need_resched())
>> - break;
>> + if (need_resched()) {
>> + has_blocked_load = true;
>> + goto abort;
>> + }
>>
>> rq = cpu_rq(balance_cpu);
>>
>
> I'd say it's safe to do the following here. The flag is raised in
> nohz_balance_enter_idle() before the smp_mb(), so we won't skip a CPU
> that just got added to nohz.idle_cpus_mask.
rq->has_blocked_load will be set before the barrier only if
nohz_tick_stopped is not already set,
Otherwise, we skip cpumask update and the barrier in nohz_balance_enter_idle
>
> /*
> * This cpu doesn't have any remaining blocked load, skip it.
> * It's sane to do this because this flag is raised in
> * nohz_balance_enter_idle()
> */
> if ((flags & NOHZ_KICK_MASK) == NOHZ_STATS_KICK &&
> !rq->has_blocked_load)
> continue;
>
>> + update_blocked_averages(rq->cpu);
>> + has_blocked_load |= rq->has_blocked_load;
>> +
>> /*
>> * If time for next balance is due,
>> * do the balance.
>> @@ -9400,7 +9474,6 @@ static bool nohz_idle_balance(struct rq *this_rq, enum cpu_idle_type idle)
>> cpu_load_update_idle(rq);
>> rq_unlock_irq(rq, &rf);
>>
>> - update_blocked_averages(rq->cpu);
>> if (flags & NOHZ_BALANCE_KICK)
>> rebalance_domains(rq, CPU_IDLE);
>> }
>> @@ -9415,7 +9488,13 @@ static bool nohz_idle_balance(struct rq *this_rq, enum cpu_idle_type idle)
>> if (flags & NOHZ_BALANCE_KICK)
>> rebalance_domains(this_rq, CPU_IDLE);
>>
>> - nohz.next_stats = next_stats;
>> + WRITE_ONCE(nohz.next_blocked,
>> + now + msecs_to_jiffies(LOAD_AVG_PERIOD));
>> +
>> +abort:
>> + /* There is still blocked load, enable periodic update */
>> + if (has_blocked_load)
>> + WRITE_ONCE(nohz.has_blocked, 1);
>>
>> /*
>> * next_balance will be updated only when there is a need.