Re: [PATCH 09/12] usb: roles: Add Intel XHCI USB role switch driver
From: Andy Shevchenko
Date: Fri Feb 16 2018 - 08:47:40 EST
On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 12:47 PM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Various Intel SoCs (Cherry Trail, Broxton and others) have an internal USB
> role switch for swiching the OTG USB data lines between the xHCI host
> controller and the dwc3 gadget controller.
>
> Note on some Cherry Trail systems there is ACPI/AML code listening to
> edge interrupts on the id-pin (through an _AIE ACPI method) and switching
> the role between ROLE_HOST and ROLE_NONE based on the id-pin. Note it does
> not set the role to ROLE_DEVICE, because device-mode is usually not used
> under Windows.
>
> The presence of AML code which modifies the cfg0 reg (on some systems)
> means that we our read/write/modify of cfg0 may race with the AML code
> doing the same to avoid this we take the global ACPI lock while doing
> the read/write/modify.
> +/* register definition */
> +#define DUAL_ROLE_CFG0 0x68
> +#define SW_VBUS_VALID (1 << 24)
> +#define SW_IDPIN_EN (1 << 21)
> +#define SW_IDPIN (1 << 20)
> +
> +#define DUAL_ROLE_CFG1 0x6c
> +#define HOST_MODE (1 << 29)
Does it make sense to use BIT() macro above?
> +struct intel_xhci_acpi_match {
> + const char *hid;
> + int hrv;
> +};
Consider to unify with struct acpi_ac_bl.
> +static const struct intel_xhci_acpi_match allow_userspace_ctrl_ids[] = {
> + { "INT33F4", 3 }, /* X-Powers AXP288 PMIC */
> +};
> +
> +static int intel_xhci_usb_set_role(struct device *dev, enum usb_role role)
> +{
> + struct intel_xhci_usb_data *data = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> + unsigned long timeout;
> + acpi_status status;
> + u32 glk = -1U;
I prefer to see consistency and moreover less confusing set, like
~0U
> + u32 val;
> +
> + /*
> + * On many CHT devices ACPI event (_AEI) handlers read / modify /
> + * write the cfg0 register, just like we do. Take the ACPI lock
> + * to avoid us racing with the AML code.
> + */
> + status = acpi_acquire_global_lock(ACPI_WAIT_FOREVER, &glk);
FOREVER?!
Wouldn't be slightly long under certain circumstances?
> + if (ACPI_FAILURE(status) && status != AE_NOT_CONFIGURED) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Error could not acquire lock\n");
> + return -EIO;
> + }
> + acpi_release_global_lock(glk);
> + /* Polling on CFG1 register to confirm mode switch.*/
> + do {
> + val = readl(data->base + DUAL_ROLE_CFG1);
> + if (!!(val & HOST_MODE) == (role == USB_ROLE_HOST))
I would prefer ^ instead of first ==, but it's up to you.
> + return 0;
> +
> + /* Interval for polling is set to about 5 - 10 ms */
> + usleep_range(5000, 10000);
> + } while (time_before(jiffies, timeout));
> +
> + dev_warn(dev, "Timeout waiting for role-switch\n");
> + return -ETIMEDOUT;
> +}
> +static int intel_xhci_usb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> + struct intel_xhci_usb_data *data;
> + struct resource *res;
> + resource_size_t size;
> + int i, ret;
> +
> + res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> + size = (res->end + 1) - res->start;
resource_size()
> + data->base = devm_ioremap_nocache(dev, res->start, size);
So, what's wrong with devm_ioremap_resource() ?
...which also prints an error message.
> + if (IS_ERR(data->base)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(data->base);
> + dev_err(dev, "Error iomaping registers: %d\n", ret);
At least printing return code is useless. Driver core does this.
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + data->role_sw = usb_role_switch_register(dev, &sw_desc);
> + if (IS_ERR(data->role_sw)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(data->role_sw);
> + dev_err(dev, "Error registering role-switch: %d\n", ret);
Ditto.
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +static const struct platform_device_id intel_xhci_usb_table[] = {
> + { .name = DRV_NAME },
> + {},
No comma, please.
> +};
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko