Re: [PATCH][next] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: avoid unintended sign extension on a 16 bit shift

[Richard Cochran]

On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 09:27:57PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> Do you prefer this, or making timehi and timelo a u64?

The latter.

While you are at it, please move the definition of 'ns' to the start
of the function.

Thanks,
Richard