Re: Trial of conflict resolution of Alan's patch

From: Paul E. McKenney
Date: Fri Feb 16 2018 - 11:52:58 EST


On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 04:47:04PM +0100, Andrea Parri wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 10:18:34AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> > On Fri, 16 Feb 2018, Akira Yokosawa wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > My forward-port patch doesn't apply to the "lkmm" branch.
> > > It looks like "linux-kernel-hardware.cat" is intentionally omitted there.
> > > Am I guessing right?
> > >
> > > If this is the case, I can prepare a patch to be applied to "lkmm".
> > > But I can't compose a proper change log. So I'd like Alan to post
> > > a patch with my SOB appended. Does this approach sound reasonable?
> >
> > The patch is not yet ready to be merged. At the very least, I need to
> > include an update to explanation.txt along with it. When it is all
> > ready, I will rebase it on Paul's repository and post it.
> >
> > Which reminds me: Now that the material has been accepted into the
> > kernel, do we need to keep the github repository? It has the
> > linux-kernel-hardware.cat file, but otherwise it seems to be redundant.
>
> If you mean "to keep up-to-date", I'd say "No, we don't..." ;-)
>
> My plan/hope is to add such a disclaimer together with a pointer
> to Linus's tree ASAP...

I agree that the github repository is useful as a historical reference
but that we should not try to keep it up to date. The -rc1 release
came out last Sunday, so in 7-8 weeks we will hopefully have this in
the Linux kernel. Fingers firmly crossed and all that...

Thanx, Paul