Re: [PATCH] x86/microcode: Check microcode revision before updating sibling threads

[Borislav Petkov]

On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 10:46:48AM -0800, Ashok Raj wrote:
> After updating microcode on one of the threads in the core, the
> thread sibling automatically gets the update since the microcode
> resources are shared. Check the ucode revision on the cpu before
> performing a ucode update.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: X86 ML <x86@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c | 11 +++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
> index 09b95a7..5802c2f 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
> @@ -786,11 +786,21 @@ static enum ucode_state apply_microcode_intel(int cpu)
>  
>  	uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu;
>  	mc = uci->mc;
> +
>  	if (!mc) {
>  		/* Look for a newer patch in our cache: */
>  		mc = find_patch(uci);
>  		if (!mc)
>  			return UCODE_NFOUND;
> +	} else {
> +		rev = intel_get_microcode_revision();
> +		/*
> +		 * Its possible the microcode got udpated
> +		 * because its sibling update was done earlier.
> +		 * Skip the udpate in that case.
> +		 */
> +		if (rev == mc->hdr.rev)
> +			goto done;
>  	}

Make that like the AMD version:

		/*
		 * Its possible the microcode got udpated
		 * because its sibling update was done earlier.
		 * Skip the udpate in that case.
		 */
		rev = intel_get_microcode_revision();
		if (rev >= mc->hdr.rev) {
			uci->cpu_sig.rev = rev;
			c->microcode = rev;

			return UCODE_OK;
		}

and make the subject prefix "x86/microcode/intel:" for your next
submission.

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix ImendÃrffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG NÃrnberg)
--