Re: [PATCH][V2] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: avoid unintended sign extension on a 16 bit shift

From: Richard Cochran
Date: Mon Feb 19 2018 - 12:37:25 EST

Next message: Dominik Brodowski: "Re: i2c-designware: sound and s2ram broken on Broadwell-U system since commit ca382f5b38f367b6 (add i2c gpio recovery option)"
Previous message: Manivannan Sadhasivam: "Re: [PATCH 10/10] MAINTAINERS: Add Actions Semi S900 pinctrl and gpio entries"
In reply to: David Laight: "RE: [PATCH][V2] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: avoid unintended sign extension on a 16 bit shift"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 12:19:16PM +0000, David Laight wrote:
> This seems to be somewhat excessive 64bit maths on a 32bit system.
> It is more than enough to make timelo/timehi 'unsigned int'.

Do you see a difference in the generated code?

Thanks,
Richard

Next message: Dominik Brodowski: "Re: i2c-designware: sound and s2ram broken on Broadwell-U system since commit ca382f5b38f367b6 (add i2c gpio recovery option)"
Previous message: Manivannan Sadhasivam: "Re: [PATCH 10/10] MAINTAINERS: Add Actions Semi S900 pinctrl and gpio entries"
In reply to: David Laight: "RE: [PATCH][V2] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: avoid unintended sign extension on a 16 bit shift"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]