[RFC PATCH tip] x86/acpi: u64_x86_init_noop() can be static

From: kbuild test robot
Date: Tue Feb 20 2018 - 07:38:34 EST

Next message: kbuild test robot: "[tip:x86/boot 8/9] arch/x86/kernel/x86_init.c:33:5: sparse: symbol 'u64_x86_init_noop' was not declared. Should it be static?"
Previous message: Dan Carpenter: "Re: [PATCH v2] staging:iio:meter: Add name to function definition arguments"
In reply to: kbuild test robot: "[tip:x86/boot 8/9] arch/x86/kernel/x86_init.c:33:5: sparse: symbol 'u64_x86_init_noop' was not declared. Should it be static?"
Next in thread: Ingo Molnar: "Re: [RFC PATCH tip] x86/acpi: u64_x86_init_noop() can be static"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Fixes: 62d8b7fba8d3 ("x86/acpi: Add a new x86_init_acpi structure to x86_init_ops")
Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx>
---
0 files changed

Next message: kbuild test robot: "[tip:x86/boot 8/9] arch/x86/kernel/x86_init.c:33:5: sparse: symbol 'u64_x86_init_noop' was not declared. Should it be static?"
Previous message: Dan Carpenter: "Re: [PATCH v2] staging:iio:meter: Add name to function definition arguments"
In reply to: kbuild test robot: "[tip:x86/boot 8/9] arch/x86/kernel/x86_init.c:33:5: sparse: symbol 'u64_x86_init_noop' was not declared. Should it be static?"
Next in thread: Ingo Molnar: "Re: [RFC PATCH tip] x86/acpi: u64_x86_init_noop() can be static"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]