On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 11:42:23AM +0200, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:Ok, then I am about to use /* SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR MIT) */
On 02/21/2018 11:17 AM, Roger Pau Monnà wrote:I would be fine with anything MIT/BSD-*/Apache-* like. In the Xen
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 10:03:34AM +0200, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:I am in any way expert in licensing, but the above seems to be
--- /dev/nullMost Xen drivers in Linux use a dual GPL/BSD license, so that they can
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xen/xen_drm_front.c
@@ -0,0 +1,83 @@
+/*
+ * Xen para-virtual DRM device
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
+ * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
+ * (at your option) any later version.
+ *
+ * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+ * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+ * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
+ * GNU General Public License for more details.
be imported into other non GPL OSes:
This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2
as published by the Free Software Foundation; or, when distributed
separately from the Linux kernel or incorporated into other
software packages, subject to the following license:
Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
of this source file (the "Software"), to deal in the Software without
restriction, including without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify,
merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell copies of the Software,
and to permit persons to whom the Software is furnished to do so, subject to
the following conditions:
The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in
all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING
FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS
IN THE SOFTWARE.
IMO it would be good to release this driver under the same license, so
it can be incorporated into other OSes.
/* SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR MIT) */
At least this is what I see at [1] for MIT.
Could you please tell which license(s) as listed at [1]
would be appropriate for Xen drivers in terms of how it is
expected to appear in the kernel code, e.g. expected
SPDX-License-Identifier?
community we have generally done dual GPL-2.0 MIT, so your proposed
tag looks fine IMO (I would also personally be fine with
MIT/BSD-*/Apache-* only).
That is clear, no objections
The point is that it would be good to have the code under a more
permissive license so it can be integrated into non GPL OSes in the
future if needed, and that your code could be used as a reference for
that.
Thanks, Roger.Thank you,