Re: [PATCH V4 1/5] perf/x86/intel: Fix event update for auto-reload

From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Wed Feb 21 2018 - 05:33:01 EST


On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 02:20:31PM -0800, kan.liang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> @@ -1389,8 +1456,22 @@ static void intel_pmu_drain_pebs_nhm(struct pt_regs *iregs)
>
> ds->pebs_index = ds->pebs_buffer_base;
>
> - if (unlikely(base >= top))
> + if (unlikely(base >= top)) {
> + /*
> + * The drain_pebs() could be called twice in a short period
> + * for auto-reload event in pmu::read(). There are no
> + * overflows have happened in between.
> + * It needs to call intel_pmu_save_and_restart_reload() to
> + * update the event->count for this case.
> + */
> + for_each_set_bit(bit, (unsigned long *)&cpuc->pebs_enabled,
> + x86_pmu.max_pebs_events) {
> + event = cpuc->events[bit];
> + if (event->hw.flags & PERF_X86_EVENT_AUTO_RELOAD)
> + intel_pmu_save_and_restart_reload(event, 0);
> + }
> return;
> + }
>
> for (at = base; at < top; at += x86_pmu.pebs_record_size) {
> struct pebs_record_nhm *p = at;

Is there a reason you didn't do intel_pmu_drain_pebs_core() ?


--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
@@ -1435,8 +1435,11 @@ static void intel_pmu_drain_pebs_core(st
return;

n = top - at;
- if (n <= 0)
+ if (n <= 0) {
+ if (event->hw.flags & PERF_X86_EVENT_AUTO_RELOAD)
+ intel_pmu_save_and_restart_reload(event, 0);
return;
+ }

__intel_pmu_pebs_event(event, iregs, at, top, 0, n);
}