[PATCH v4 6/6] vfio/type1: remove duplicate retrieval of reserved regions.
From: Shameer Kolothum
Date: Wed Feb 21 2018 - 07:23:52 EST
As we now already have the reserved regions list, just pass that into
vfio_iommu_has_sw_msi() fn.
Signed-off-by: Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c | 15 ++++++---------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
index c08adb5..56f68b1 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
@@ -1192,15 +1192,13 @@ static struct vfio_group *find_iommu_group(struct vfio_domain *domain,
return NULL;
}
-static bool vfio_iommu_has_sw_msi(struct iommu_group *group, phys_addr_t *base)
+static bool vfio_iommu_has_sw_msi(struct list_head *group_resv_regions,
+ phys_addr_t *base)
{
- struct list_head group_resv_regions;
- struct iommu_resv_region *region, *next;
+ struct iommu_resv_region *region;
bool ret = false;
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&group_resv_regions);
- iommu_get_group_resv_regions(group, &group_resv_regions);
- list_for_each_entry(region, &group_resv_regions, list) {
+ list_for_each_entry(region, group_resv_regions, list) {
/*
* The presence of any 'real' MSI regions should take
* precedence over the software-managed one if the
@@ -1216,8 +1214,7 @@ static bool vfio_iommu_has_sw_msi(struct iommu_group *group, phys_addr_t *base)
ret = true;
}
}
- list_for_each_entry_safe(region, next, &group_resv_regions, list)
- kfree(region);
+
return ret;
}
@@ -1552,7 +1549,7 @@ static int vfio_iommu_type1_attach_group(void *iommu_data,
if (ret)
goto out_detach;
- resv_msi = vfio_iommu_has_sw_msi(iommu_group, &resv_msi_base);
+ resv_msi = vfio_iommu_has_sw_msi(&group_resv_regions, &resv_msi_base);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&domain->group_list);
list_add(&group->next, &domain->group_list);
--
2.7.4