Re: [PATCH 0/8] target-iSCSI: Adjustments for several function implementations
From: SF Markus Elfring
Date: Wed Feb 21 2018 - 11:46:50 EST
> Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 22:22:11 +0100
>
> Some update suggestions were taken into account
> from static source code analysis.
>
> Markus Elfring (8):
> Less function calls in chap_server_compute_md5() after error detection
> Move resetting of seven variables in chap_server_compute_md5()
> Delete 36 error messages for a failed memory allocation
> Delete an unnecessary variable initialisation in iscsit_allocate_ooo_cmdsn()
> Delete an unnecessary variable initialisation in iscsi_copy_param_list()
> Delete an unnecessary variable initialisation in iscsi_create_default_params()
> Delete an unnecessary variable initialisation in iscsi_set_default_param()
> Improve 16 size determinations
>
> drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target.c | 2 -
> drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_auth.c | 110 +++++++++++-----------
> drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_datain_values.c | 6 +-
> drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_erl1.c | 14 +--
> drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_erl2.c | 8 +-
> drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_login.c | 29 ++----
> drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_nego.c | 4 +-
> drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_parameters.c | 58 +++++-------
> drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_seq_pdu_list.c | 34 +++----
> drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_tpg.c | 13 +--
> drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_util.c | 11 +--
> 11 files changed, 118 insertions(+), 171 deletions(-)
One of these update suggestions resulted in the commit âtarget: avoid NULL
dereference in CHAP auth error pathâ which is considered for integration
into Linux stable versions now.
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10110459/
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/<20171213172230.12767-1-ddiss@xxxxxxx>
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_auth.c?id=ce512d79d0466a604793addb6b769d12ee326822
Now I am curious if more remaining change possibilities can be picked up
from this patch series.
* Would you like to improve any more implementation details?
* Do you need additional explanations for further benefits?
Regards,
Markus