Re: [PATCH] KVM: arm/arm64: No need to zero CNTVOFF in kvm_timer_vcpu_put() for VHE

[Christoffer Dall]

Hi Shanker,

On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 09:38:07AM -0600, Shanker Donthineni wrote:
> In AArch64/AArch32, the virtual counter uses a fixed virtual offset
> of zero in the following situations as per ARMv8 specifications:
> 
> 1) HCR_EL2.E2H is 1, and CNTVCT_EL0/CNTVCT are read from EL2.
> 2) HCR_EL2.{E2H, TGE} is {1, 1}, and either:
>    â CNTVCT_EL0 is read from Non-secure EL0 or EL2.
>    â CNTVCT is read from Non-secure EL0.
> 
> So, no need to zero CNTVOFF_EL2/CNTVOFF for VHE case.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shanker Donthineni <shankerd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c | 6 ++++--
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c b/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c
> index 70268c0..86eca324 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c
> @@ -541,9 +541,11 @@ void kvm_timer_vcpu_put(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	 * The kernel may decide to run userspace after calling vcpu_put, so
>  	 * we reset cntvoff to 0 to ensure a consistent read between user
>  	 * accesses to the virtual counter and kernel access to the physical
> -	 * counter.
> +	 * counter of non-VHE case. For VHE, the virtual counter uses a fixed
> +	 * virtual offset of zero, so no need to zero CNTVOFF_EL2 register.
>  	 */
> -	set_cntvoff(0);
> +	if (!has_vhe())
> +		set_cntvoff(0);
>  }
>  
>  /*

I'm okay with this change.  I don't think there's a huge gain here
though.

Marc, any thoughts or concerns?

Thanks,
-Christoffer