Re: [PATCH v4] reset: add support for non-DT systems
From: Philipp Zabel
Date: Thu Feb 22 2018 - 06:35:04 EST
On Tue, 2018-02-20 at 10:40 -0600, David Lechner wrote:
[...]
> > In your case the platform code that adds the lookup may be identical to
> > the code that registers the struct reset_controller_dev, but that
> > doesn't have to be the case. I'm not sure how that is supposed to work
> > for the phy framework (I see no platform code adding phy lookups, only
> > drivers).
> >
> In our use case, we would be adding the lookup in the driver rather than
> in the platform code, which is why I am suggesting doing it like the phy
> framework.
Shouldn't it be the job of the platform code to describe the connections
between reset controller and peripheral module reset
inputs?
regards
Philipp