Re: [PATCH v4 08/10] ARM: sunxi: smp: Move assembly code into a file

[Maxime Ripard]

On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 02:37:40PM +0100, Mylène Josserand wrote:
> Move the assembly code for cluster cache enabling
> into an assembly file instead of having it directly in C code.
> 
> Create a sunxi_boot entry that will perform a cluster cached
> enabling and called secondary_startup.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mylène Josserand <mylene.josserand@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Makefile  |  1 +
>  arch/arm/mach-sunxi/headsmp.S | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/arm/mach-sunxi/mc_smp.c  | 76 ++++---------------------------------------
>  3 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-sunxi/headsmp.S
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Makefile b/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Makefile
> index 7de9cc286d53..d1a072b879ed 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Makefile
> @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
>  CFLAGS_mc_smp.o	+= -march=armv7-a
>  
>  obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_SUNXI) += sunxi.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_SUNXI) += headsmp.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_SUNXI_MC_SMP) += mc_smp.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_SMP) += platsmp.o
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/headsmp.S b/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/headsmp.S
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..4f5957a6e188
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/headsmp.S
> @@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
> +/*
> + * SMP support for sunxi based systems with Cortex A7/A15
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2018 Bootlin

This is just a copy, and while you can claim that you are one of the
copyrights holder, you are not the sole one and the original author
should be there.

> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.

You want to use SPDX there instead.

> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/linkage.h>
> +#include <asm/assembler.h>
> +
> +ENTRY(sunxi_mc_smp_cluster_cache_enable)
> +	/*
> +	* Enable cluster-level coherency, in preparation for turning on the MMU.
> +	*
> +	* Also enable regional clock gating and L2 data latency settings for
> +	* Cortex-A15. These settings are from the vendor kernel.
> +	*/

The indentation is not correct there, the * should be aligned

> +	mrc	p15, 0, r1, c0, c0, 0
> +	movw	r2, #(0xff00fff0&0xffff)
> +	movt	r2, #(0xff00fff0>>16)

This used to be defines, we should keep them, and we should have
spaces around the operators as well.

> +	and	r1, r1, r2
> +	movw	r2, #(0x4100c0f0&0xffff)
> +	movt	r2, #(0x4100c0f0>>16)
> +	cmp	r1, r2
> +	bne	not_a15
> +
> +	/* The following is Cortex-A15 specific */
> +
> +	/* ACTLR2: Enable CPU regional clock gates */
> +	mrc p15, 1, r1, c15, c0, 4
> +	orr r1, r1, #(0x1<<31)
> +	mcr p15, 1, r1, c15, c0, 4
> +
> +	/* L2ACTLR */
> +	mrc p15, 1, r1, c15, c0, 0
> +	/* Enable L2, GIC, and Timer regional clock gates */
> +	orr r1, r1, #(0x1<<26)
> +	/* Disable clean/evict from being pushed to external */
> +	orr r1, r1, #(0x1<<3)
> +	mcr p15, 1, r1, c15, c0, 0
> +
> +	/* L2CTRL: L2 data RAM latency */
> +	mrc p15, 1, r1, c9, c0, 2
> +	bic r1, r1, #(0x7<<0)
> +	orr r1, r1, #(0x3<<0)
> +	mcr p15, 1, r1, c9, c0, 2
> +
> +	/* End of Cortex-A15 specific setup */
> +	not_a15:
> +
> +	/* Get value of sunxi_mc_smp_first_comer */
> +	adr	r1, first
> +	ldr	r0, [r1]
> +	ldr	r0, [r1, r0]
> +
> +	/* Skip cci_enable_port_for_self if not first comer */
> +	cmp	r0, #0
> +	bxeq	lr
> +	b	cci_enable_port_for_self
> +
> +	.align 2
> +	first: .word sunxi_mc_smp_first_comer - .
> +ENDPROC(sunxi_mc_smp_cluster_cache_enable)
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP

I guess that whole file should be compiled only if we have SMP
enabled.

> +ENTRY(sunxi_boot)
> +	bl	sunxi_mc_smp_cluster_cache_enable
> +	b	secondary_startup
> +ENDPROC(sunxi_boot)
> +#endif
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/mc_smp.c b/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/mc_smp.c
> index f2c2cfca28cd..4e807cc11a0f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/mc_smp.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/mc_smp.c
> @@ -82,6 +82,9 @@ static void __iomem *prcm_base;
>  static void __iomem *sram_b_smp_base;
>  static bool is_sun9i;
>  
> +extern void sunxi_boot(void);

Why did you change the name of that function? The older one made it
more obvious to tell what is going on.

> +extern void sunxi_cluster_cache_enable(void);

Is that used somewhere?

Thanks!
Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature