[PATCH 4.4 166/193] KVM: x86: Make indirect calls in emulator speculation safe

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

4.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

(cherry picked from commit 1a29b5b7f347a1a9230c1e0af5b37e3e571588ab)

Replace the indirect calls with CALL_NOSPEC.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: rga@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Asit Mallick <asit.k.mallick@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Arjan Van De Ven <arjan.van.de.ven@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180125095843.595615683@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[dwmw2: Use ASM_CALL_CONSTRAINT like upstream, now we have it]
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
[backport to 4.4]
Signed-off-by: Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c |    9 +++++----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
 #include <asm/kvm_emulate.h>
 #include <linux/stringify.h>
 #include <asm/debugreg.h>
+#include <asm/nospec-branch.h>
 
 #include "x86.h"
 #include "tss.h"
@@ -1000,8 +1001,8 @@ static u8 test_cc(unsigned int condition
 	void (*fop)(void) = (void *)em_setcc + 4 * (condition & 0xf);
 
 	flags = (flags & EFLAGS_MASK) | X86_EFLAGS_IF;
-	asm("push %[flags]; popf; call *%[fastop]"
-	    : "=a"(rc) : [fastop]"r"(fop), [flags]"r"(flags));
+	asm("push %[flags]; popf; " CALL_NOSPEC
+	    : "=a"(rc) : [thunk_target]"r"(fop), [flags]"r"(flags));
 	return rc;
 }
 
@@ -5297,9 +5298,9 @@ static int fastop(struct x86_emulate_ctx
 	ulong flags = (ctxt->eflags & EFLAGS_MASK) | X86_EFLAGS_IF;
 	if (!(ctxt->d & ByteOp))
 		fop += __ffs(ctxt->dst.bytes) * FASTOP_SIZE;
-	asm("push %[flags]; popf; call *%[fastop]; pushf; pop %[flags]\n"
+	asm("push %[flags]; popf; " CALL_NOSPEC "; pushf; pop %[flags]\n"
 	    : "+a"(ctxt->dst.val), "+d"(ctxt->src.val), [flags]"+D"(flags),
-	      [fastop]"+S"(fop)
+	      [thunk_target]"+S"(fop)
 	    : "c"(ctxt->src2.val));
 	ctxt->eflags = (ctxt->eflags & ~EFLAGS_MASK) | (flags & EFLAGS_MASK);
 	if (!fop) /* exception is returned in fop variable */